Chylack L T, Padhye N, Khu P M, Wehner C, Wolfe J, McCarthy D, Rosner B, Friend J
Center for Clinical Cataract Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1993 Jan;77(1):7-11. doi: 10.1136/bjo.77.1.7.
Contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was assessed in a population of diabetics with moderate cataracts to determine if CSF testing provides more information about visual dysfunction than Snellen or Lotmar interferometric visual acuity. With the Lens Opacities Classification Systems Version II (LOCS II) of cataract classification it was possible to grade accurately the type and severity of cataract and nuclear brunescence. The presence of statistically significant relationships between increasing LOCS II classification (worsening cataract) and diminished function, even when the regression model was controlled for Snellen visual acuity, supports the thesis that CSF measurements do provide more information about cataract related visual loss than Snellen acuity alone. Statistically significant (p < or = 0.05) relationships existed between different morphological types of cataract, nuclear colour, and CSF at specific frequencies. The frequencies affected differed with cataract type or nuclear colour, and with distance and near CSF.
对患有中度白内障的糖尿病患者群体进行了对比敏感度函数(CSF)评估,以确定CSF检测是否比斯内伦视力表或洛特马干涉视力测量能提供更多有关视觉功能障碍的信息。采用白内障分类的晶状体混浊分类系统第二版(LOCS II)能够准确分级白内障的类型和严重程度以及核性棕色化。即使在回归模型中对斯内伦视力进行了控制,增加的LOCS II分类(白内障恶化)与功能减退之间仍存在统计学上的显著关系,这支持了CSF测量确实比单独的斯内伦视力能提供更多有关白内障相关视力丧失信息的论点。在特定频率下,不同形态类型的白内障、核颜色和CSF之间存在统计学上的显著(p≤0.05)关系。受影响的频率因白内障类型或核颜色以及远、近CSF而有所不同。