Suppr超能文献

患有晶状体混浊分类系统(LOCS II)分级白内障的糖尿病患者对比敏感度丧失。

Loss of contrast sensitivity in diabetic patients with LOCS II classified cataracts.

作者信息

Chylack L T, Padhye N, Khu P M, Wehner C, Wolfe J, McCarthy D, Rosner B, Friend J

机构信息

Center for Clinical Cataract Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 1993 Jan;77(1):7-11. doi: 10.1136/bjo.77.1.7.

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was assessed in a population of diabetics with moderate cataracts to determine if CSF testing provides more information about visual dysfunction than Snellen or Lotmar interferometric visual acuity. With the Lens Opacities Classification Systems Version II (LOCS II) of cataract classification it was possible to grade accurately the type and severity of cataract and nuclear brunescence. The presence of statistically significant relationships between increasing LOCS II classification (worsening cataract) and diminished function, even when the regression model was controlled for Snellen visual acuity, supports the thesis that CSF measurements do provide more information about cataract related visual loss than Snellen acuity alone. Statistically significant (p < or = 0.05) relationships existed between different morphological types of cataract, nuclear colour, and CSF at specific frequencies. The frequencies affected differed with cataract type or nuclear colour, and with distance and near CSF.

摘要

对患有中度白内障的糖尿病患者群体进行了对比敏感度函数(CSF)评估,以确定CSF检测是否比斯内伦视力表或洛特马干涉视力测量能提供更多有关视觉功能障碍的信息。采用白内障分类的晶状体混浊分类系统第二版(LOCS II)能够准确分级白内障的类型和严重程度以及核性棕色化。即使在回归模型中对斯内伦视力进行了控制,增加的LOCS II分类(白内障恶化)与功能减退之间仍存在统计学上的显著关系,这支持了CSF测量确实比单独的斯内伦视力能提供更多有关白内障相关视力丧失信息的论点。在特定频率下,不同形态类型的白内障、核颜色和CSF之间存在统计学上的显著(p≤0.05)关系。受影响的频率因白内障类型或核颜色以及远、近CSF而有所不同。

相似文献

2
Contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in patients with early cataracts.早期白内障患者的对比敏感度和视力
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 May;19(3):399-404. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80313-6.
8
Objective line spread function measurements, Snellen acuity, and LOCS II classification in patients with cataract.
Optom Vis Sci. 1993 Nov;70(11):956-62. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199311000-00013.

引用本文的文献

5
Spatial visual filtering in diabetes mellitus.糖尿病中的空间视觉过滤
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun;241(6):489-96. doi: 10.1007/s00417-003-0678-9. Epub 2003 May 7.

本文引用的文献

2
Arden grating test in evaluating "early" posterior subcapsular cataracts.
South Med J. 1981 Nov;74(11):1368-70. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198111000-00019.
3
Contrast sensitivity in diabetics with retinopathy and cataract.
Aust J Ophthalmol. 1982 Aug;10(3):173-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1982.tb00380.x.
4
A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart.一种新型对比敏感度视力测试图。
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984 Jun;61(6):403-7. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198406000-00011.
5
The Haag-Streit Lotmar Visometer for determining macular potential prior to cataract surgery.
J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1985 Nov;11(6):581-3. doi: 10.1016/s0146-2776(85)80138-5.
6
The Oxford Clinical Cataract Classification and Grading System.
Int Ophthalmol. 1986 Dec;9(4):207-25. doi: 10.1007/BF00137534.
8
Lens Opacities Classification System.晶状体混浊分类系统
Arch Ophthalmol. 1988 Mar;106(3):330-4. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130356020.
9
Evaluation of a Lens Opacities Classification System.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1988 Mar;106(3):327-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130353019.
10
Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II).晶状体混浊分类系统II(LOCS II)。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1989 Jul;107(7):991-7. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020053028.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验