McNicholas W T, Coffey M, Boyle T
Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College, Dublin, Ireland.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Mar;147(3):620-3. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.3.620.
The nasal airway is a common route for oxygen delivery to hypoxemic patients, and it has been advocated as a suitable route for intermittent positive pressure ventilation to patients in respiratory failure. There is, however, conflicting evidence on the question of whether nasal airflow has a stimulant or a depressant effect on ventilation. We therefore studied the effects on ventilation of increasing and decreasing nasal airflow during sleep, thereby avoiding the voluntary and behavioral influences on breathing seen during wakefulness. After an acclimatization night, each of nine normal male volunteers (20 to 28 yr of age) underwent overnight sleep studies using standard techniques. Each sleep study had three phases of at least 2-h durations: (1) control nasal breathing (CNB); (2) added nasal flow of 4 L of compressed air via nasal prongs (ANF); (3) predominant mouth breathing (PMB). Significant differences were found by ANOVA for the three experimental periods for both minute ventilation (Vl) and mean inspiratory flow rate (VT/Tl) during Stage 2 sleep, with the highest values occurring during ANF. Vl was 5.40 +/- 0.58 L/min (mean +/- SD) during ANF, 5.35 +/- 0.82 during CNB, and 4.92 +/- 0.71 during PMB (p < 0.05 by ANOVA). VT/Tl was 266 +/- 23 ml/s during ANF, 248 +/- 39 during CNB, and 241 +/- 30 during PMB (p < 0.02 by ANOVA). VT also tended to be higher during ANF (p < 0.1 by ANOVA). Respiratory frequency did not differ significantly during the three study periods. There was insufficient slow-wave and REM sleep to allow ventilatory comparisons in these sleep stages.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
鼻气道是向低氧血症患者输送氧气的常用途径,并且一直被提倡作为对呼吸衰竭患者进行间歇正压通气的合适途径。然而,关于鼻气流对通气是有刺激作用还是抑制作用这一问题,存在相互矛盾的证据。因此,我们研究了睡眠期间增加和减少鼻气流对通气的影响,从而避免了清醒时观察到的对呼吸的自主和行为影响。经过一个适应夜晚后,9名正常男性志愿者(年龄在20至28岁之间)每人使用标准技术进行了整夜睡眠研究。每项睡眠研究有三个持续时间至少为2小时的阶段:(1)对照鼻呼吸(CNB);(2)通过鼻叉添加4L压缩空气的鼻气流(ANF);(3)主要经口呼吸(PMB)。通过方差分析发现,在第2阶段睡眠期间,三个实验阶段的分钟通气量(Vl)和平均吸气流量(VT/Tl)均存在显著差异,最高值出现在ANF阶段。ANF阶段的Vl为5.40±0.58L/分钟(平均值±标准差),CNB阶段为5.35±0.82,PMB阶段为4.92±0.71(方差分析,p<0.05)。ANF阶段的VT/Tl为266±23ml/秒,CNB阶段为248±39,PMB阶段为241±30(方差分析,p<0.02)。ANF阶段的VT也往往更高(方差分析,p<0.1)。在三个研究阶段中,呼吸频率没有显著差异。慢波睡眠和快速眼动睡眠不足,无法在这些睡眠阶段进行通气比较。(摘要截短于250字)