Suppr超能文献

使用自动动态血压监测比较喹那普利和阿替洛尔单药治疗或与氢氯噻嗪联合治疗中度至重度高血压患者的疗效。

Comparison of quinapril and atenolol as single drugs or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in moderate to severe hypertensives, using automated ambulatory monitoring.

作者信息

Lacourcière Y, Lefebvre J, Provencher P, Poirier L

机构信息

Hypertension Unit, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Feb;35(2):121-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb05677.x.

Abstract
  1. Forty patients with moderate to severe hypertension and daytime ambulatory diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mm Hg were randomized double-blind to once-daily treatment with either quinapril up to 20 mg (n = 20) or atenolol up to 100 mg (n = 20) as single drugs or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg over a period of 12 weeks. 2. Conventional and ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, side effects and metabolic changes were compared at the end of the run-in period on placebo, after 4 weeks on monotherapy and at the end of the 12-week period of active treatment. 3. Quinapril and atenolol reduced conventional blood pressure equally with substantial additional effect seen on combination therapy. The two regimens induced a significant decrease in ambulatory BP. However, the atenolol treated ambulatory hypertensive group experienced significantly greater decreases in diastolic blood pressure during 24 h, awake and sleep periods than did the quinapril group. 4. Adverse reactions were mild with both drugs except for severe Raynaud phenomenon in one patient in the atenolol group. Triglyceride levels were significantly increased with atenolol alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. 5. Thus, within the limits of the dose ranges tested, quinapril and atenolol as single drugs or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide reduce significantly conventional and ambulatory blood pressure in moderate to severe hypertensives, but atenolol is more effective in reducing ambulatory diastolic blood pressure.
摘要
  1. 40例中重度高血压患者,日间动态舒张压≥90 mmHg,被随机双盲分为两组,一组每日服用高达20 mg的喹那普利(n = 20),另一组每日服用高达100 mg的阿替洛尔(n = 20),单药治疗或与25 mg氢氯噻嗪联合治疗,为期12周。2. 在安慰剂导入期结束时、单药治疗4周后以及12周积极治疗期结束时,比较常规血压和动态血压、心率、副作用及代谢变化。3. 喹那普利和阿替洛尔降低常规血压的效果相当,联合治疗有显著的附加效应。两种治疗方案均使动态血压显著下降。然而,阿替洛尔治疗的动态高血压组在24小时、清醒期和睡眠期的舒张压下降幅度显著大于喹那普利组。4. 除阿替洛尔组有1例患者出现严重雷诺现象外,两种药物的不良反应均较轻。单独使用阿替洛尔以及与氢氯噻嗪联合使用时,甘油三酯水平显著升高。5. 因此,在所测试的剂量范围内,喹那普利和阿替洛尔单药治疗或与氢氯噻嗪联合使用,均可显著降低中重度高血压患者的常规血压和动态血压,但阿替洛尔在降低动态舒张压方面更有效。

相似文献

8
The treatment of moderate to severe hypertension with ACE inhibitors.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;15 Suppl 2:S29-35. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199000152-00006.

本文引用的文献

1
The triglyceride issue: a view from Framingham.甘油三酯问题:来自弗雷明汉的观点。
Am Heart J. 1986 Aug;112(2):432-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90296-6.
8
Plasma triglyceride levels and coronary disease.血浆甘油三酯水平与冠心病
N Engl J Med. 1989 May 11;320(19):1273-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198905113201910.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验