• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用自动动态血压监测比较喹那普利和阿替洛尔单药治疗或与氢氯噻嗪联合治疗中度至重度高血压患者的疗效。

Comparison of quinapril and atenolol as single drugs or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in moderate to severe hypertensives, using automated ambulatory monitoring.

作者信息

Lacourcière Y, Lefebvre J, Provencher P, Poirier L

机构信息

Hypertension Unit, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Feb;35(2):121-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb05677.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb05677.x
PMID:8443029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1381502/
Abstract
  1. Forty patients with moderate to severe hypertension and daytime ambulatory diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mm Hg were randomized double-blind to once-daily treatment with either quinapril up to 20 mg (n = 20) or atenolol up to 100 mg (n = 20) as single drugs or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg over a period of 12 weeks. 2. Conventional and ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, side effects and metabolic changes were compared at the end of the run-in period on placebo, after 4 weeks on monotherapy and at the end of the 12-week period of active treatment. 3. Quinapril and atenolol reduced conventional blood pressure equally with substantial additional effect seen on combination therapy. The two regimens induced a significant decrease in ambulatory BP. However, the atenolol treated ambulatory hypertensive group experienced significantly greater decreases in diastolic blood pressure during 24 h, awake and sleep periods than did the quinapril group. 4. Adverse reactions were mild with both drugs except for severe Raynaud phenomenon in one patient in the atenolol group. Triglyceride levels were significantly increased with atenolol alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. 5. Thus, within the limits of the dose ranges tested, quinapril and atenolol as single drugs or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide reduce significantly conventional and ambulatory blood pressure in moderate to severe hypertensives, but atenolol is more effective in reducing ambulatory diastolic blood pressure.
摘要
  1. 40例中重度高血压患者,日间动态舒张压≥90 mmHg,被随机双盲分为两组,一组每日服用高达20 mg的喹那普利(n = 20),另一组每日服用高达100 mg的阿替洛尔(n = 20),单药治疗或与25 mg氢氯噻嗪联合治疗,为期12周。2. 在安慰剂导入期结束时、单药治疗4周后以及12周积极治疗期结束时,比较常规血压和动态血压、心率、副作用及代谢变化。3. 喹那普利和阿替洛尔降低常规血压的效果相当,联合治疗有显著的附加效应。两种治疗方案均使动态血压显著下降。然而,阿替洛尔治疗的动态高血压组在24小时、清醒期和睡眠期的舒张压下降幅度显著大于喹那普利组。4. 除阿替洛尔组有1例患者出现严重雷诺现象外,两种药物的不良反应均较轻。单独使用阿替洛尔以及与氢氯噻嗪联合使用时,甘油三酯水平显著升高。5. 因此,在所测试的剂量范围内,喹那普利和阿替洛尔单药治疗或与氢氯噻嗪联合使用,均可显著降低中重度高血压患者的常规血压和动态血压,但阿替洛尔在降低动态舒张压方面更有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of quinapril and atenolol as single drugs or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in moderate to severe hypertensives, using automated ambulatory monitoring.使用自动动态血压监测比较喹那普利和阿替洛尔单药治疗或与氢氯噻嗪联合治疗中度至重度高血压患者的疗效。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Feb;35(2):121-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb05677.x.
2
Controlled multicenter study with quinapril, hydrochlorothiazide, and combination in patients with moderate to severe hypertension.喹那普利、氢氯噻嗪及其联合用药治疗中重度高血压的对照多中心研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995 Jul;26(1):114-8. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199507000-00018.
3
Antihypertensive effect of low-dose hydrochlorothiazide alone or in combination with quinapril in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension.低剂量氢氯噻嗪单独或与喹那普利联合使用对轻度至中度高血压黑人患者的降压效果。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Jul;40(7):713-21. doi: 10.1177/00912700022009468.
4
Quinapril versus atenolol in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.
Clin Ther. 1992 Jul-Aug;14(4):527-36.
5
Quinapril, hydrochlorothiazide, and combination in patients with moderate to severe hypertension.喹那普利、氢氯噻嗪及其联合用药治疗中重度高血压患者
Eur Heart J. 1994 Jul;15(7):940-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060614.
6
Comparison of the combination of enalapril and a very low dose of hydrochlorothiazide with atenolol in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Scandinavian Study Group.依那普利与极低剂量氢氯噻嗪联合用药与阿替洛尔治疗轻至中度高血压患者的比较。斯堪的纳维亚研究小组。
Am J Hypertens. 1997 Aug;10(8):899-904. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00110-6.
7
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors as initial monotherapy in severe hypertension. Quinapril and captopril.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂作为重度高血压的初始单一疗法。喹那普利和卡托普利。
Am J Hypertens. 1991 Oct;4(10 Pt 1):827-31. doi: 10.1093/ajh/4.10.827.
8
The treatment of moderate to severe hypertension with ACE inhibitors.使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗中重度高血压。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;15 Suppl 2:S29-35. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199000152-00006.
9
Usefulness of moexipril and hydrochlorothiazide in moderately severe essential hypertension.莫昔普利与氢氯噻嗪治疗中度严重原发性高血压的有效性
Am J Ther. 1997 Apr;4(4):123-9. doi: 10.1097/00045391-199704000-00003.
10
ACE inhibitor versus beta-blocker for the treatment of hypertension in renal allograft recipients.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与β受体阻滞剂治疗肾移植受者高血压的比较
Hypertension. 1999 Mar;33(3):862-8. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.33.3.862.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of betablockers on the course of Martorell hypertensive ulcers: a retrospective study.美托洛尔类药物对 Martorell 高血压性溃疡病程的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 Nov 7;104:adv41087. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.41087.
2
Peripheral vasoconstriction induced by β-adrenoceptor blockers: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis.β肾上腺素受体阻滞剂引起的外周血管收缩:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;82(2):549-60. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12980. Epub 2016 May 31.
3
Comparative efficacy of two different beta-blockers on 24-hour blood pressure control.两种不同β受体阻滞剂对24小时血压控制的疗效比较。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Feb;10(2):112-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.08021.x.
4
Quinapril: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.喹那普利:其在心血管疾病中的药理学及治疗应用的进一步更新
Drugs. 2002;62(2):339-85. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262020-00009.
5
Quinapril. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in cardiovascular disorders.喹那普利。对其在心血管疾病中的药理学和治疗效果的重新评估。
Drugs. 1994 Aug;48(2):227-52. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199448020-00008.

本文引用的文献

1
The triglyceride issue: a view from Framingham.甘油三酯问题:来自弗雷明汉的观点。
Am Heart J. 1986 Aug;112(2):432-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90296-6.
2
The effects of drug treatment for hypertension on morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease: a review of randomized controlled trials.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;29(3 Suppl 1):99-118. doi: 10.1016/0033-0620(86)90038-1.
3
Characterization of antihypertensive therapy by whole-day blood pressure monitoring.通过全天血压监测对降压治疗进行特征分析。
JAMA. 1988 Jun 10;259(22):3281-5.
4
How common is white coat hypertension?白大褂高血压有多常见?
JAMA. 1988 Jan 8;259(2):225-8.
5
Validation of portable noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices: comparisons with intra-arterial and sphygmomanometer measurements.便携式无创血压监测设备的验证:与动脉内测量和血压计测量的比较
Am Heart J. 1988 Oct;116(4):1155-60. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90181-0.
6
Automated blood pressure monitoring for the assessment of antihypertensive treatment.用于评估降压治疗的自动血压监测
Am J Cardiol. 1988 Oct 5;62(11):97G-102G. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90040-9.
7
Antihypertensive efficacy of lisinopril. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.赖诺普利的降压疗效。动态血压监测。
Am J Hypertens. 1988 Jul;1(3 Pt 3):274S-279S. doi: 10.1093/ajh/1.3.274s.
8
Plasma triglyceride levels and coronary disease.血浆甘油三酯水平与冠心病
N Engl J Med. 1989 May 11;320(19):1273-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198905113201910.
9
Influence of zofenopril and low doses of hydrochlorothiazide on plasma lipoproteins in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.佐芬普利与小剂量氢氯噻嗪对轻至中度原发性高血压患者血浆脂蛋白的影响。
Am J Hypertens. 1989 Nov;2(11 Pt 1):861-4. doi: 10.1093/ajh/2.11.861.
10
Ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the evaluation of blood pressure lowering drugs.动态血压监测在降压药物评估中的应用
J Hypertens. 1989 Apr;7(4):243-7.