• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Teaching choice making during social interactions to students with profound multiple disabilities.向重度多重残疾学生传授社交互动中的决策能力。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):63-76. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-63.
2
Teaching individuals with profound multiple disabilities to access preferred stimuli with multiple microswitches.教授有严重多重残疾的个体使用多个微操作器获取其偏好的刺激物。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2352-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.027. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
3
Analyzing alertness among people with profound multiple disabilities: implications for provision of training.分析重度多重残疾者的警觉性:对提供培训的启示
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;27(3):519-31. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-519.
4
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
5
Teaching elementary students with developmental disabilities to recruit teacher attention in a general education classroom: effects on teacher praise and academic productivity.在普通教育课堂中教发育障碍小学生吸引教师注意:对教师表扬和学业成绩的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Fall;31(3):399-415. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-399.
6
Defining, validating, and increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities.定义、验证并提高重度多重残疾者的幸福指数。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):67-78. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-67.
7
A demonstration of generalization of performance across settings, materials, and motor responses for students with profound mental retardation.对重度智力障碍学生在不同场景、材料和运动反应方面表现泛化的一项展示。
Behav Modif. 1995 Jan;19(1):119-43. doi: 10.1177/01454455950191007.
8
Identifying critical social interaction behaviors among high school students with and without disabilities.识别有残疾和无残疾的高中生之间的关键社交互动行为。
Behav Modif. 1999 Jan;23(1):41-60. doi: 10.1177/0145445599231002.
9
A microswitch program including words and choice opportunities for students with multiple disabilities.
Percept Mot Skills. 2004 Feb;98(1):214-22. doi: 10.2466/pms.98.1.214-222.
10
Fading teacher prompts from peer-initiation interventions for young children with disabilities.针对残疾幼儿的同伴发起干预中逐渐减少教师提示
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):307-17. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-307.

引用本文的文献

1
A practitioner's guide to emphasizing choice-making opportunities in behavioral services provided to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.为智力和发育障碍人士提供行为服务时强调选择机会的从业者指南。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2023 Feb 1;69(1):101-110. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2117911. eCollection 2023.
2
Systematic assessment of food item preference and reinforcer effectiveness: Enhancements in training laboratory-housed rhesus macaques.食物偏好和强化物有效性的系统评估:圈养恒河猴训练实验室的改进
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
3
Comparing Single Case Design Overlap-Based Effect Size Metrics From Studies Examining Speech Generating Device Interventions.比较研究言语生成设备干预的单病例设计中基于重叠的效应量指标。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 May;121(3):169-93. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-121.3.169.
4
Passive and Active Approach Responses in Preference Assessment for Children With Profound Multiple Disabilities and Minimal Movement.重度多重残疾且运动极少儿童偏好评估中的被动与主动方法反应
J Dev Disabl. 2008;14(2):61-68.
5
A review of interventions to teach a mand repertoire.一项关于教授“要求”技能库的干预措施的综述。
Anal Verbal Behav. 1995;12:53-66. doi: 10.1007/BF03392897.
6
Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.对通过预处理和每日简短偏好评估确定的刺激的相对强化效果进行检查。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):463-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-463.
7
Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.强化物选择对发育障碍个体任务反应的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):411-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-411.
8
Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.由受试者与实验者选择的强化物对重度发育障碍个体行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Spring;28(1):61-71. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-61.

本文引用的文献

1
Vibration as a reinforcer with a profoundly retarded child.用振动作为强化物对严重智障儿童进行训练。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Summer;2(2):135-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-135.
2
Operant conditioning of a vegetative human organism.植物人机体的操作性条件反射
Am J Psychol. 1949 Oct;62(4):587-90.
3
Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.强化物变化:对激励发育障碍儿童的启示
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;14(3):345-50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-345.
4
Motivating autistic children through stimulus variation.通过刺激变化激发自闭症儿童的积极性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Winter;13(4):619-27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-619.
5
The influence of task variation and maintenance tasks on the learning and affect of autistic children.任务变化和维持性任务对自闭症儿童学习及情感的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1984 Feb;37(1):41-64. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(84)90057-2.
6
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.对重度智力迟钝个体的刺激偏好和强化物价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
7
Evaluation of reinforcer preferences for profoundly handicapped students.对重度残疾学生强化物偏好的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Summer;18(2):173-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-173.
8
Training students with profound or multiple handicaps to make requests via microswitches.训练重度或多重残疾学生通过微动开关提出请求。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Winter;21(4):331-43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-331.
9
Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences.识别重度残障人士的强化物:工作人员意见与偏好的系统评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;21(1):31-43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-31.
10
Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals.对严重残疾个体偏好的计算机化评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Winter;19(4):445-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-445.

向重度多重残疾学生传授社交互动中的决策能力。

Teaching choice making during social interactions to students with profound multiple disabilities.

作者信息

Kennedy C H, Haring T G

机构信息

College of Education, University of Hawaii, Honolulu 96822.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):63-76. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-63.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1993.26-63
PMID:8473259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1297720/
Abstract

We taught 4 students with profound multiple disabilities to use a microswitch communication system to request a change in recreational stimuli during social interactions with nondisabled peers. In Study 1, we conducted a preference assessment across a range of stimuli for each student. The most and least preferred stimuli were incorporated into microswitch communication system training in Study 2. During the second study, 3 of the 4 students (a) learned to use the microswitch communication system to control stimulus presentation, (b) more clearly differentiated their time among stimuli, and (c) increased their level of general alertness. Study 3 extended the use of the microswitch communication system to social interactions with nondisabled peers. Two students were more engaged in interactions when they chose when to change stimuli; 1 student was more alert when a peer chose when to change activities; a 4th student showed an undifferentiated pattern. The outcomes of the investigation are discussed in terms of the effects of controlling stimulus presentation on the behavior of students with profound multiple disabilities and the stability of preference hierarchies over time.

摘要

我们教会了4名重度多重残疾学生使用微动开关通信系统,以便在与非残疾同伴进行社交互动时请求更换娱乐刺激物。在研究1中,我们针对每名学生对一系列刺激物进行了偏好评估。在研究2中,将最受偏好和最不受偏好的刺激物纳入微动开关通信系统训练。在第二项研究中,4名学生中的3名:(a)学会了使用微动开关通信系统来控制刺激物呈现;(b)在不同刺激物之间的时间分配上有了更清晰的区分;(c)提高了整体警觉水平。研究3将微动开关通信系统的使用扩展到与非残疾同伴的社交互动中。两名学生在选择何时更换刺激物时更积极参与互动;一名学生在同伴选择何时更换活动时更警觉;第四名学生表现出无差异的模式。我们从控制刺激物呈现对重度多重残疾学生行为的影响以及偏好等级随时间的稳定性方面讨论了该调查的结果。