• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Determining the pattern of community care: is coresidence more important than caregiver relationship?

作者信息

Tennstedt S L, Crawford S, McKinlay J B

机构信息

New England Research Institute, Watertown, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Gerontol. 1993 Mar;48(2):S74-83. doi: 10.1093/geronj/48.2.s74.

DOI:10.1093/geronj/48.2.s74
PMID:8473708
Abstract

Researchers have previously emphasized the importance of kinship tie to explaining the pattern of care received by a disabled elder. For example, it has been argued that spouses are a distinct group of caregivers, i.e., they provide more care with less help from others and experience more stress. However, based on the theory of primary group structures and functions, this study hypothesized that coresidence rather than the kinship tie is more important in determining the pattern of caregiving. When spouses are compared to other coresiding caregivers, patterns of informal care and use of formal services are similar. Variance in amounts of informal care is explained by elder gender and frailty level rather than by caregiver relationship. Similarly, level of frailty was the only important predictor of use of formal services.

摘要

相似文献

1
Determining the pattern of community care: is coresidence more important than caregiver relationship?
J Gerontol. 1993 Mar;48(2):S74-83. doi: 10.1093/geronj/48.2.s74.
2
A longitudinal study looking at and beyond care recipient health as a predictor of long term care home admission.一项纵向研究,将受护理者的健康状况及其他因素视为长期护理院入住情况的预测指标进行观察。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2671-8.
3
Social support and risk-adjusted mortality in a frail older population.脆弱老年人群中的社会支持与风险调整死亡率
Med Care. 2004 Aug;42(8):779-88. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000132397.49094.b3.
4
How important is functional status as a predictor of service use by older people?功能状态作为老年人服务使用预测指标的重要性如何?
J Aging Health. 1990 Nov;2(4):439-61. doi: 10.1177/089826439000200402.
5
Predictors of elders' and family caregivers' use of formal home services.老年人及家庭照顾者使用正规家庭服务的预测因素。
Res Nurs Health. 1998 Dec;21(6):533-43. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199812)21:6<533::aid-nur7>3.0.co;2-i.
6
[Evaluation of gender differences of family caregivers with reference to the mode of caregiving at home and caregiver distress in Japan].[参照日本家庭护理模式及护理者困扰对家庭护理者性别差异的评估]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2004 Apr;51(4):240-51.
7
Frailty differences in older adults' use of informal and formal care.老年人对非正式和正式护理的使用存在脆弱性差异。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Nov-Dec;79:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jun 2.
8
Assistance with personal care activities among the old-old in Israel: a national epidemiological study.以色列高龄老人日常生活活动的协助情况:一项全国性流行病学研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Sep;49(9):1176-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49234.x.
9
Longitudinal changes in the amount of informal care among publicly paid home care recipients.公共支付家庭护理接受者中非正式护理量的纵向变化。
Gerontologist. 2005 Aug;45(4):465-73. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.4.465.
10
Effects of home-based long-term care services on caregiver health according to age.居家长期护理服务对不同年龄段照料者健康的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 23;15(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0786-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal Dyadic Analysis of Psychosocial and Health Outcomes in Black Breast Cancer Patients and Their Informal Caregivers.黑人乳腺癌患者及其非正式照料者心理社会和健康结局的纵向二元分析
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251362950. doi: 10.1177/10732748251362950. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
2
Societal Costs of Dementia: 204 Countries, 2000-2019.痴呆症的社会成本:204 个国家,2000-2019 年。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;101(1):277-292. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240163.
3
Aging in isolation: Sexual orientation differences in navigating cognitive decline.
孤立衰老:认知衰退应对中的性取向差异
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Jul 14;27:101699. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101699. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
The positive impact of informal spousal caregiving on the physical activity of older adults.非正式配偶护理对老年人身体活动的积极影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 16;10:977846. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.977846. eCollection 2022.
5
Exploring the Needs of Spousal, Adult Child, and Adult Sibling Informal Caregivers: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review.探索配偶、成年子女和成年兄弟姐妹等非正式照料者的需求:一项混合方法的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 25;13:832974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832974. eCollection 2022.
6
Patterns of Caregiving Among Older Adults With and Without Dementia: A Latent Class Analysis.有和没有痴呆症的老年患者的照护模式:潜在类别分析。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 May 20;77(Suppl_1):S74-S85. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab237.
7
The Dyadic Cancer Outcomes Framework: A general framework of the effects of cancer on patients and informal caregivers.对偶癌症结局框架:癌症对患者和非专业照护者影响的通用框架。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Oct;287:114357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114357. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
8
Being an older family caregiver does not impact healthcare and mortality: Data from the study 'Good Aging in Skåne'.作为一名年长的家庭护理员,并不会对医疗保健和死亡率产生影响:来自“斯科讷良好老龄化研究”的数据。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Mar;50(2):223-231. doi: 10.1177/1403494820960648. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
9
Experiences of oldest-old caregivers whose partner is approaching end-of-life: A mixed-method systematic review and narrative synthesis.最年长的照顾者(其伴侣即将走到生命尽头)的体验:一项混合方法系统评价和叙事综合研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 9;15(6):e0232401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232401. eCollection 2020.
10
Sleep Disruption Due to Stress in Women Veterans: A Comparison between Caregivers and Noncaregivers.女性退伍军人的应激性睡眠障碍:照料者与非照料者之间的比较。
Behav Sleep Med. 2021 Mar-Apr;19(2):243-254. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2020.1732981. Epub 2020 Feb 29.