• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

控制烟草使用和预防心血管疾病的环境与政策干预措施。

Environmental and policy interventions to control tobacco use and prevent cardiovascular disease.

作者信息

Brownson R C, Koffman D M, Novotny T E, Hughes R G, Eriksen M P

机构信息

Department of Community Health, School of Public Health, Saint Louis University, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Q. 1995 Nov;22(4):478-98. doi: 10.1177/109019819502200406.

DOI:10.1177/109019819502200406
PMID:8550372
Abstract

Despite its declining prevalence during the past few decades, tobacco use remains one of the most significant public health issues of the 1990s. Environmental and policy interventions are among the most cost-effective approaches to control tobacco use and prevent cardiovascular diseases. In this article, the authors review and offer to state and local health departments and other public health partners a summary of recommended policy and environmental interventions that have either reduced or show potential to reduce tobacco use. Priority recommendations include clean indoor air policies, restrictions on tobacco advertising and promotion, policies limiting youth access to tobacco, comprehensive school health programs, and excise taxes and other economic incentives. Many of these recommendations should be integrated with other health promotion interventions to also improve nutrition and physical activity. The authors also highlight several successful interventions and strategies used to establish policies at the state and local levels.

摘要

尽管在过去几十年里烟草使用率呈下降趋势,但烟草使用仍是20世纪90年代最重要的公共卫生问题之一。环境和政策干预措施是控制烟草使用和预防心血管疾病最具成本效益的方法之一。在本文中,作者回顾并向州和地方卫生部门以及其他公共卫生合作伙伴提供了一份推荐的政策和环境干预措施总结,这些措施已经减少或显示出减少烟草使用的潜力。优先建议包括清洁室内空气政策、限制烟草广告和促销、限制年轻人获取烟草的政策、全面的学校健康计划以及消费税和其他经济激励措施。其中许多建议应与其他健康促进干预措施相结合,以改善营养和身体活动。作者还强调了在州和地方层面用于制定政策的几个成功干预措施和策略。

相似文献

1
Environmental and policy interventions to control tobacco use and prevent cardiovascular disease.控制烟草使用和预防心血管疾病的环境与政策干预措施。
Health Educ Q. 1995 Nov;22(4):478-98. doi: 10.1177/109019819502200406.
2
Public policy for the control of tobacco-related disease.控制烟草相关疾病的公共政策。
Med Clin North Am. 1992 Mar;76(2):515-39. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30365-0.
3
Tobacco control policies and smoking cessation treatment utilization: A moderated mediation analysis.控烟政策与戒烟治疗利用:一个有调节的中介分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 30;16(8):e0241512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241512. eCollection 2021.
4
Investing in youth tobacco control: a review of smoking prevention and control strategies.投资于青少年烟草控制:吸烟预防与控制策略综述
Tob Control. 2000 Mar;9(1):47-63. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.1.47.
5
State preemption of local tobacco control policies restricting smoking, advertising, and youth access--United States, 2000-2010.州政府对限制吸烟、广告和青少年吸烟的地方烟草控制政策的优先干预——美国,2000-2010 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Aug 26;60(33):1124-7.
6
Tobacco control in New Jersey: a public forum on smoking and youth.新泽西州的烟草控制:一场关于吸烟与青少年的公共论坛。
N J Med. 1993 Nov;90(11):836-8.
7
What impact have tobacco control policies, cigarette price and tobacco control programme funding had on Australian adolescents' smoking? Findings over a 15-year period.烟草控制政策、卷烟价格和烟草控制规划资金对澳大利亚青少年吸烟有何影响?15 年来的研究结果。
Addiction. 2011 Aug;106(8):1493-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03429.x. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
8
Policy interventions and surveillance as strategies to prevent tobacco use in adolescents and young adults.作为预防青少年和青年烟草使用策略的政策干预与监测
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Dec;33(6 Suppl):S335-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.014.
9
Involving older Americans in the war on tobacco. The American Stop Smoking Intervention Study for Cancer Prevention.让美国老年人参与烟草防治之战。美国癌症预防戒烟干预研究。
Cancer. 1994 Oct 1;74(7 Suppl):2062-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7+<2062::aid-cncr2820741713>3.0.co;2-v.
10
Preventing adolescent tobacco use and assisting young people to quit: population-, community-, and individually focused evidence-based interventions.预防青少年吸烟和帮助青少年戒烟:以人口、社区和个人为重点的基于证据的干预措施。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;47(1):119-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Recontextualizing the social norms construct as applied to health promotion.重新审视应用于健康促进的社会规范建构。
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Feb 21;10:100560. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100560. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Policies that limit youth access and exposure to tobacco: a scientific neglect of the first stages of the policy process.限制青少年获取和接触烟草的政策:政策过程初期的科学忽视。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 26;19(1):825. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7073-x.
3
Evaluating Community Readiness to Implement Environmental and Policy-Based Alcohol Abuse Prevention Strategies in Wisconsin.
评估威斯康星州实施基于环境和政策的酒精滥用预防策略的社区准备情况。
J Alcohol Drug Educ. 2013 Dec;57(3):27-50.
4
Implementation and spread of interventions into the multilevel context of routine practice and policy: implications for the cancer care continuum.干预措施在常规实践和政策的多层次背景下的实施与推广:对癌症护理连续统一体的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 May;2012(44):86-99. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs004.
5
State legislation savvy: a primer and tools for online legislative research in the United States.州立法知识:美国在线立法研究的入门和工具。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E20. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
6
A cost-effectiveness analysis of India's 2008 prohibition of smoking in public places in Gujarat.印度古吉拉特邦 2008 年公共场所禁烟令的成本效益分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 May;8(5):1271-86. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8051271. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
7
The impact of social norm change strategies on smokers' quitting behaviours.社会规范改变策略对吸烟者戒烟行为的影响。
Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i51-5. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.029447.
8
Children's secondhand smoke exposure in private homes and cars: an ethical analysis.儿童在私人住宅和汽车中接触二手烟的情况:一项伦理分析。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Dec;98(12):2140-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.130856. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
9
Do local tobacco regulations influence perceived smoking norms? Evidence from adult and youth surveys in Massachusetts.地方烟草法规会影响人们对吸烟规范的认知吗?来自马萨诸塞州成人和青少年调查的证据。
Health Educ Res. 2008 Aug;23(4):709-22. doi: 10.1093/her/cym054. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
10
Chronic disease control in public health practice: looking back and moving forward.公共卫生实践中的慢性病控制:回顾与展望。
Public Health Rep. 2004 May-Jun;119(3):230-8. doi: 10.1016/j.phr.2004.04.001.