• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of monoclonal antibodies for immunostaining in the cytomegalovirus shell vial assay on 4,388 specimens.

作者信息

St George K, Rinaldo C R

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Med Virol. 1995 Nov;47(3):269-71. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890470313.

DOI:10.1002/jmv.1890470313
PMID:8551279
Abstract

The shell vial assay is a sensitive, rapid test for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in a variety of specimens. The sensitivity of this assay is dependent on a number of factors including the antibodies used for immunostaining. Monoclonal antibodies to the CMV major immediate-early antigen (p72) from Chemicon (MAB810) and Dupont (NEA-9221) were assessed side by side in duplicate vials on 4,388 specimens from a patient population consisting of > 90% organ transplant recipients. A total of 240 specimens (5.5%) were CMV positive in either one or both vials. Positivity rates were variable across different specimen types but highest (12.9%) in urine specimens. Of the positive specimens, 175 (72.9%) tested positive in both vials, 43 (17.9%) tested positive in the Chemicon-stained vial only, and 22 (9.2%) tested positive in the Dupont-stained vial only (P < 0.01, McNemar's chi-square test). This gave an overall positivity rate of 5.0% for Chemicon antibodies and 4.5% for Dupont. There was no difference in the fluorescent focus counts produced by the two antibody sets. It is concluded that use of the Chemicon antibodies provides increased sensitivity of detection of CMV in the shell vial assay above that afforded by the Dupont antibody.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of monoclonal antibodies for immunostaining in the cytomegalovirus shell vial assay on 4,388 specimens.
J Med Virol. 1995 Nov;47(3):269-71. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890470313.
2
[Rapid diagnosis of infection by cytomegalovirus using early-antigen detection (shell vial)].[使用早期抗原检测(空斑小瓶法)进行巨细胞病毒感染的快速诊断]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1991 Nov;9(9):564-6.
3
[Comparison of immunofluorescence reagents for the detection of the early antigen of cytomegaloviruses in the Shell-vial].[用于检测壳瓶中巨细胞病毒早期抗原的免疫荧光试剂比较]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1991 Feb;9(2):100-1.
4
Optimizing recovery of cytomegalovirus in the shell vial culture procedure.优化巨细胞病毒在细胞培养管培养程序中的回收率。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Mar-Apr;14(2):125-30. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90046-i.
5
[Detection of cytomegalovirus in urine by the shell-vial technique: usefulness of diluting the sample].
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1991 Nov;9(9):561-3.
6
Comparison of standard tube and shell vial cell culture techniques for the detection of cytomegalovirus in clinical specimens.用于检测临床标本中巨细胞病毒的标准管和细胞培养瓶细胞培养技术的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Feb;21(2):217-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.2.217-221.1985.
7
Clinical comparison of two assays for rapid detection of cytomegalovirus early nuclear antigen.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1990 Mar;93(3):373-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/93.3.373.
8
Clinical experience with cytomegalovirus isolation using conventional cell cultures and early antigen detection in centrifugation-enhanced shell vial cultures.使用传统细胞培养技术分离巨细胞病毒以及在离心增强的空斑培养中进行早期抗原检测的临床经验。
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jun;27(6):1159-62. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1159-1162.1989.
9
[Preparation of monoclonal antibodies to super early human cytomegalovirus proteins and their use for detecting infected cells].[人巨细胞病毒超早期蛋白单克隆抗体的制备及其在检测感染细胞中的应用]
Vopr Virusol. 1996 Jan-Feb;41(1):28-32.
10
Multisite evaluation of a monoclonal antibody reagent (Syva) for rapid diagnosis of cytomegalovirus in the shell vial assay.用于在病毒分离培养管检测中快速诊断巨细胞病毒的单克隆抗体试剂(Syva)的多中心评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Jul;27(7):1502-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.7.1502-1505.1989.