Lauterwein M, Oethinger M, Belsner K, Peters T, Marre R
Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology of Natural Compounds, University of Ulm, Germany.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Nov;39(11):2541-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.11.2541.
Secondary metabolites of different species of lichen were tested for their activities against a variety of microbial species. While gram-negative rods and fungi were not inhibited by these compounds, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, and some anaerobic species (Bacteroides and Clostridium species) were susceptible at the concentrations tested. Vulpinic acid generally was less active than usnic acid, regardless of its stereochemistry. The susceptibility to usnic acid was not impaired in clinical isolates of S. aureus resistant to methicillin and/or mupirocin.
对不同种类地衣的次生代谢产物进行了测试,以检测其对多种微生物的活性。虽然这些化合物对革兰氏阴性杆菌和真菌没有抑制作用,但金黄色葡萄球菌、粪肠球菌、屎肠球菌和一些厌氧菌(拟杆菌属和梭菌属)在测试浓度下是敏感的。无论其立体化学结构如何,狐衣酸的活性通常低于松萝酸。对耐甲氧西林和/或莫匹罗星的金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株而言,其对松萝酸的敏感性并未受损。