• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分的前瞻性评估。

Prospective evaluation of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score.

作者信息

Samy A K, Murray G, MacBain G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Garrick Hospital, Stranraer, UK.

出版信息

J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1996 Apr;41(2):105-7.

PMID:8632380
Abstract

The Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS), developed and published by the same authors, is a clinical prognostic scoring system that predicts mortality when operating on either intact or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) taking into account these clinical criteria: patient's age, shock at presentation, myocardial disease, cerebrovascular disease and renal disease. The GAS was prospectively evaluated by studying 320 consecutive patients with AAA who were operated on at Glasgow, Aberdeen and Inverness, Scotland, in the period between January 1990 and May 1993. Logistic regression analysis showed very similar results to the original analysis used in developing the score. Age, shock, myocardial disease and renal disease were highly significant. Although it was not significant, cerebrovascular disease weight was not significantly different to its value in the original analysis. The mortality correlated well with the values of the score and ranged from 0% for scores below '70 GAS' to 80% for scores over '95 GAS'. The GAS appears, therefore, to be a reliable clinical predicative tool in foretelling the outcome of operating on AAA in terms of operative in-hospital mortality.

摘要

格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分(GAS)由同一批作者研发并发表,是一种临床预后评分系统,用于预测在对完整或破裂的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)进行手术时的死亡率,该评分系统考虑了以下临床标准:患者年龄、就诊时的休克情况、心肌病、脑血管疾病和肾病。通过研究1990年1月至1993年5月期间在苏格兰格拉斯哥、阿伯丁和因弗内斯接受手术的320例连续性AAA患者,对GAS进行了前瞻性评估。逻辑回归分析显示的结果与最初制定该评分时所使用的分析结果非常相似。年龄、休克、心肌病和肾病具有高度显著性。虽然脑血管疾病权重不具有显著性,但其数值与最初分析中的数值并无显著差异。死亡率与评分值密切相关,评分低于“70 GAS”时死亡率为0%,评分高于“95 GAS”时死亡率为80%。因此,就手术院内死亡率而言,GAS似乎是预测AAA手术结果的可靠临床预测工具。

相似文献

1
Prospective evaluation of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score.格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分的前瞻性评估。
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1996 Apr;41(2):105-7.
2
Validity of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score and the Hardman Index in predicting outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分和哈德曼指数在预测腹主动脉瘤破裂修复术后结局中的有效性。
Br J Surg. 2005 May;92(5):570-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4907.
3
Glasgow aneurysm score predicts the outcome after emergency open repair of symptomatic, unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分可预测有症状的未破裂腹主动脉瘤急诊开放修复术后的结局。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.006. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
4
Comparison of risk-scoring methods in predicting the immediate outcome after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.择期开放性腹主动脉瘤手术后预测近期预后的风险评分方法比较
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Nov;34(5):505-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.07.019. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
5
Value of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score in predicting the immediate and long-term outcome after elective open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分在预测择期开放性修复肾下腹主动脉瘤术后近期和远期预后中的价值。
Br J Surg. 2003 Jul;90(7):838-44. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4130.
6
Glasgow Aneurysm Score as a predictor of immediate outcome after surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分作为腹主动脉瘤破裂手术后即刻预后的预测指标。
Br J Surg. 2004 Nov;91(11):1449-52. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4634.
7
Glasgow aneurysm score.格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分
Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Feb;2(1):41-4.
8
POSSUM models in open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.开放性腹主动脉瘤手术中的POSSUM模型
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Nov;34(5):499-504. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
9
Preoperative risk stratification in patients undergoing elective infrarenal aortic aneurysm surgery: evaluation of five risk scoring methods.接受择期肾下腹主动脉瘤手术患者的术前风险分层:五种风险评分方法的评估
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 Jul;28(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.02.010.
10
The relationship between volume and outcome following elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in 131 German hospitals.131家德国医院择期开放性腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术后容量与预后的关系。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Sep;34(3):260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
External Validation of Risk Stratification Models Predicting the Immediate Mortality After Open Repair of Ruptured AAA.预测破裂性腹主动脉瘤开放修复术后即刻死亡率的风险分层模型的外部验证
World J Surg. 2016 Jul;40(7):1771-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3461-x.
2
Role of pre-operative multiple gated acquisition scanning in predicting long-term outcome in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.术前多门控采集扫描在预测择期腹主动脉瘤修复患者长期预后中的作用。
World J Surg. 2013 May;37(5):1169-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1939-3.
3
Comparison of risk-scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
腹主动脉瘤修复术后预测医院死亡率的风险评分系统比较
Int J Angiol. 2008 Winter;17(4):181-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1278306.
4
Do scoring systems help in predicting survival following ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery?评分系统对预测腹主动脉瘤破裂手术后的生存率有帮助吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Mar;91(2):123-7. doi: 10.1308/003588409X359376. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
5
Pre-operative risk scores for the prediction of outcome in elderly people who require emergency surgery.用于预测需要急诊手术的老年人预后的术前风险评分。
World J Emerg Surg. 2007 Jun 5;2:16. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-2-16.
6
Ruptured aortic aneurysm: the decision not to operate.主动脉瘤破裂:不进行手术的决定。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1998 May;80(3):221-5.