• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分

Glasgow aneurysm score.

作者信息

Samy A K, Murray G, MacBain G

机构信息

General Surgical Unit, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Feb;2(1):41-4.

PMID:8049922
Abstract

A clinical prognostic scoring system for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and audit of the sequelae of a sample population in Glasgow, are described. Randomly selected case notes of 500 patients, representing 41.6% (500 of 1202) of the total population treated in Glasgow hospitals with general surgical units (as opposed to vascular units) between 1980 and 1990, were examined for risk factors. These were then related to the operative and postoperative hospital mortality. Initial univariate analysis showed the outcome to be significantly influenced by the following factors: age (P = < 0.01), rupture (P = < 0.001), shock (P = < 0.001), myocardial disease (P = 0.08), cerebrovascular disease (P = 0.03), renal disease (P = 0.03) and size of the aneurysm (P = 0.06). Using multivariate analysis, the following independent risk factors were identified: age (P = 0.02), shock (P = < 0.001), myocardial disease (P = 0.02), cerebrovascular disease (P = 0.02) and renal disease (P = 0.003). Rounding of the regression coefficients created a simple risk score: risk score = (age in years)+(17 for shock)+(7 for myocardial disease)+(10 for cerebrovascular disease)+(14 for renal disease). Subsequent evaluation of the scoring system showed that the mortality rate increases in proportion to the score. Other findings are analysed and discussed.

摘要

本文描述了一种针对腹主动脉瘤患者的临床预后评分系统,并对格拉斯哥一个样本群体的后遗症进行了审计。对1980年至1990年间在格拉斯哥医院普通外科病房(而非血管外科病房)接受治疗的全部患者中随机抽取的500例病例记录(占总数的41.6%,即1202例中的500例)进行了危险因素检查。然后将这些因素与手术及术后医院死亡率相关联。初始单因素分析显示,以下因素对结果有显著影响:年龄(P = < 0.01)、破裂(P = < 0.001)、休克(P = < 0.001)、心肌病(P = 0.08)、脑血管疾病(P = 0.03)、肾脏疾病(P = 0.03)和动脉瘤大小(P = 0.06)。使用多因素分析,确定了以下独立危险因素:年龄(P = 0.02)、休克(P = < 0.001)、心肌病(P = 0.02)、脑血管疾病(P = 0.02)和肾脏疾病(P = 0.003)。回归系数的四舍五入产生了一个简单的风险评分:风险评分 =(年龄)+(休克为17)+(心肌病为7)+(脑血管疾病为10)+(肾脏疾病为14)。随后对评分系统的评估表明,死亡率随评分成比例增加。对其他发现进行了分析和讨论。

相似文献

1
Glasgow aneurysm score.格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分
Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Feb;2(1):41-4.
2
Glasgow Aneurysm Score as a predictor of immediate outcome after surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分作为腹主动脉瘤破裂手术后即刻预后的预测指标。
Br J Surg. 2004 Nov;91(11):1449-52. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4634.
3
Prospective evaluation of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score.格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分的前瞻性评估。
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1996 Apr;41(2):105-7.
4
Preoperative risk stratification in patients undergoing elective infrarenal aortic aneurysm surgery: evaluation of five risk scoring methods.接受择期肾下腹主动脉瘤手术患者的术前风险分层:五种风险评分方法的评估
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 Jul;28(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.02.010.
5
Open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: is it possible to predict survival?腹主动脉瘤破裂的开放修复术:能否预测生存率?
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Mar;23(2):159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
6
Risk-scoring methods in predicting the immediate outcome after emergency open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.预测腹主动脉瘤破裂急诊开放修复术后近期结局的风险评分方法
Am J Surg. 2006 Jul;192(1):19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.026.
7
Value of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score in predicting the immediate and long-term outcome after elective open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分在预测择期开放性修复肾下腹主动脉瘤术后近期和远期预后中的价值。
Br J Surg. 2003 Jul;90(7):838-44. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4130.
8
Outcome and survival of patients aged 75 years and older compared to younger patients after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: do the results justify the effort?与年轻患者相比,75岁及以上患者腹主动脉瘤破裂修复后的结局和生存率:这些结果是否证明付出的努力是值得的?
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):469-77. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.10.009. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
9
Validity of the Hardman index to predict outcome in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.哈德曼指数预测腹主动脉瘤破裂预后的有效性。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;21(1):34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.08.002.
10
Glasgow aneurysm score predicts the outcome after emergency open repair of symptomatic, unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分可预测有症状的未破裂腹主动脉瘤急诊开放修复术后的结局。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;33(3):272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.09.006. Epub 2006 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of different intensive care scoring systems and Glasgow Aneurysm score for aortic aneurysm in predicting 28-day mortality: a retrospective cohort study from MIMIC-IV database.比较不同的重症监护评分系统和格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分对预测主动脉瘤 28 天死亡率的作用:来自 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04184-4.
2
Intraoperative Predictors and Proposal for a Novel Prognostic Risk Score for In-Hospital Mortality after Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (SPARTAN Score).腹主动脉瘤破裂开放修复术后院内死亡的术中预测因素及新型预后风险评分建议(斯巴达评分)
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 28;13(5):1384. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051384.
3
Risk Prediction Models for Peri-Operative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Major Vascular Surgery with Particular Focus on Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Scoping Review.
接受大血管手术患者围手术期死亡率的风险预测模型,尤其关注破裂腹主动脉瘤:一项范围综述。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 24;12(17):5505. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175505.
4
Prognostic model for survival of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular aneurysm repair.腹主动脉瘤患者行血管内修复术后生存的预后模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 15;12(1):19540. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24060-5.
5
Identification of Risk Factors and Development of Predictive Risk Score Model for Mortality after Open Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.开放性腹主动脉瘤破裂修复术后死亡风险因素的识别及预测风险评分模型的建立。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 15;58(4):549. doi: 10.3390/medicina58040549.
6
Glasgow Aneurysm Score: a predictor of long-term mortality following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm?格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分:能否预测腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后的长期死亡率?
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02366-y.
7
Operative Strategy of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms and Management of Postoperative Complications.腹主动脉瘤破裂的手术策略及术后并发症的处理
Ann Vasc Dis. 2019 Sep 25;12(3):323-328. doi: 10.3400/avd.ra.19-00074.
8
Improved Outcomes for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using Integrated Management Involving Endovascular Clamping, Endovascular Replacement, and Open Abdominal Decompression.采用包括血管内夹闭、血管内修复和开放腹部减压的综合管理方法改善破裂腹主动脉瘤的治疗效果。
Ann Vasc Dis. 2017 Mar 24;10(1):22-28. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.16-00110. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
9
Validating a benchmarking tool for audit of early outcomes after operations for head and neck cancer.验证一种用于头颈癌手术后早期疗效审计的基准工具。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Apr;99(4):299-306. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0319. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
10
Patient selection and perioperative outcomes are similar between targeted and nontargeted hospitals (in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.(在国家外科质量改进计划中),接受腹主动脉瘤修复手术的患者在目标医院和非目标医院之间的选择及围手术期结果相似。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;65(2):362-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.066. Epub 2016 Jul 25.