• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低容量眼试验的实验室内和实验室间再现性的测定及其与Draize眼试验的统计关系。

Determination of the intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility of the low volume eye test and its statistical relationship to the Draize eye test.

作者信息

Cormier E M, Parker R D, Henson C, Cruse L W, Merritt A K, Bruce R D, Osborne R

机构信息

Procter & Gamble Far East, Inc., Kobe Technical Center, Kobe, 658, Japan.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1996 Apr;23(2):156-61. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.0037.

DOI:10.1006/rtph.1996.0037
PMID:8661334
Abstract

The reproducibility of toxicologic test methods, including alternative tests, is a key scientific and regulatory concern. In the present work, historic rabbit eye irritation data were used to determine the intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility of the low volume eye test (LVET). The standard Draize eye irritation test was used as the basis for comparison. The LVET and Draize tests had similar degrees of intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility as determined by examination of their coefficients of variation, although the variability in LVET results was directionally lower. Results from 70 parallel Draize and LVET tests indicated a strong positive association between results from the two tests, for corneal, iridial, conjunctival, and maximum average scores (MAS). Correlation coefficients were 0.60, 0.73, 0.69, and 0.73, respectively (P </= 0.0001). The linear relationship between LVET and Draize MAS values was examined by regression analysis and found to follow the relationship LVET MAS = 0.522 (Draize MAS). Thus, the LVET is at least as reproducible as the Draize test and gives responses that are (linearly) correlated to the Draize. The previous findings that the LVET is more predictive of human eye responses than the Draize test lends additional support for its use as a refined alternative to the Draize test.

摘要

毒理学测试方法(包括替代测试)的可重复性是一个关键的科学和监管问题。在本研究中,利用历史兔眼刺激数据来确定低容量眼测试(LVET)在实验室内和实验室间的可重复性。标准的Draize眼刺激试验用作比较的基础。通过检查变异系数发现,LVET和Draize试验在实验室内和实验室间具有相似程度的可重复性,尽管LVET结果的变异性在方向上较低。70次平行的Draize试验和LVET试验结果表明,两种试验在角膜、虹膜、结膜和最大平均得分(MAS)方面的结果呈强正相关。相关系数分别为0.60、0.73、0.69和0.73(P≤0.0001)。通过回归分析研究了LVET和Draize MAS值之间的线性关系,发现符合LVET MAS = 0.522(Draize MAS)的关系。因此,LVET至少与Draize试验一样具有可重复性,并且给出的反应与Draize试验(呈线性)相关。先前的研究发现,LVET比Draize试验更能预测人眼反应,这为其作为Draize试验的一种改进替代方法提供了额外支持。

相似文献

1
Determination of the intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility of the low volume eye test and its statistical relationship to the Draize eye test.低容量眼试验的实验室内和实验室间再现性的测定及其与Draize眼试验的统计关系。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1996 Apr;23(2):156-61. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.0037.
2
A comparison of low volume, Draize and in vitro eye irritation test data. III. Surfactant-based formulations.低容量、德雷兹试验和体外眼刺激试验数据的比较。III. 基于表面活性剂的制剂。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1998 Mar;36(3):209-31. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00135-x.
3
[Study on the use of haemoglobin denaturation test as an alternative to Draize eye irritation test].[血红蛋白变性试验作为替代Draize眼刺激试验的应用研究]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2004 Sep;35(5):654-7.
4
A comparison of low volume, draize and in vitro eye irritation test data. II. Oil/water emulsions.低容量、Draize试验和体外眼刺激试验数据的比较。II. 油/水乳液。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1998 Jan;36(1):47-59. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00110-5.
5
Comparison of low-volume, Draize and in vitro eye irritation test data. I. Hydroalcoholic formulations.低容量、Draize试验和体外眼刺激试验数据的比较。I. 水醇制剂。
Food Chem Toxicol. 1996 Aug;34(8):737-49. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(96)00027-0.
6
[Study on using the hen's egg test-chorioallantoic membrane as an alternative method of draize eye irritation test].[关于使用鸡胚绒毛尿囊膜作为Draize眼刺激试验替代方法的研究]
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2004 May;33(3):279-83.
7
The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: an evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize primary eye irritation test. (Phase III) surfactant-based formulations.化妆品成分审核委员会替代方法评估项目:对德莱兹眼刺激原试验体外替代方法的评估。(第三阶段)基于表面活性剂的配方
Food Chem Toxicol. 1996 Jan;34(1):79-117. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(96)89525-1.
8
Comparison of in vitro eye irritation potential by bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay to erythema scores in human eye sting test of surfactant-based formulations.通过牛角膜混浊和通透性(BCOP)试验对基于表面活性剂的制剂进行人眼刺痛试验时,体外眼刺激潜力与红斑评分的比较。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2008;27(2):77-85. doi: 10.1080/15569520801914381.
9
A rapid cell culture technique for assessing the toxicity of detergent-based products in vitro as a possible screen for eye irritancy in vivo.一种快速细胞培养技术,用于体外评估基于洗涤剂的产品的毒性,作为体内眼刺激性的一种可能筛选方法。
Cytobios. 1983;36(143-44):153-9.
10
Evaluation of a human corneal epithelial cell line as an in vitro model for assessing ocular irritation.评估一种人角膜上皮细胞系作为评估眼刺激的体外模型。
Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1997 Apr;36(2):130-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting toxicity of chemicals: software beats animal testing.预测化学物质的毒性:软件胜过动物试验。
EFSA J. 2019 Jul 8;17(Suppl 1):e170710. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170710. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
Assessment of in vitro COPD models for tobacco regulatory science: Workshop proceedings, conclusions and paths forward for in vitro model use.用于烟草监管科学的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)体外模型评估:研讨会会议记录、结论及体外模型使用的未来方向
Altern Lab Anim. 2016 May;44(2):129-66. doi: 10.1177/026119291604400206.
3
Cosmetics Europe compilation of historical serious eye damage/eye irritation in vivo data analysed by drivers of classification to support the selection of chemicals for development and evaluation of alternative methods/strategies: the Draize eye test Reference Database (DRD).
欧洲化妆品协会对历史上严重眼损伤/眼刺激体内数据的汇编,这些数据按分类驱动因素进行分析,以支持化学品开发及替代方法/策略评估的化学品选择:德莱兹眼试验参考数据库(DRD)
Arch Toxicol. 2017 Feb;91(2):521-547. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1679-x. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
4
Retrospective analysis of the Draize test for serious eye damage/eye irritation: importance of understanding the in vivo endpoints under UN GHS/EU CLP for the development and evaluation of in vitro test methods.对严重眼损伤/眼刺激的德莱兹试验的回顾性分析:理解联合国全球化学品统一分类和标签制度/欧盟化学品分类、标签和包装法规下的体内终点对于体外试验方法开发和评估的重要性。
Arch Toxicol. 2014 Mar;88(3):701-23. doi: 10.1007/s00204-013-1156-8. Epub 2013 Dec 28.