Boldt J, Heesen M, Müller M, Pabsdorf M, Hempelmann G
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
Anesth Analg. 1996 Aug;83(2):254-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199608000-00010.
Sufficient intravascular fluid therapy is of major importance in the treatment of the critically ill patient. The present study assessed whether the cardiorespiratory response of long-term volume replacement with low-molecular weight (LMW) hydroxyethyl starch solution (HES) differs from that of human albumin (HA). According to a randomized sequence, 30 trauma patients (injury severity score [ISS] between 15 and 30) and 30 sepsis patients (secondary to major general surgery) received either 10% HES (mean molecular weight 200,000 daltons; HES trauma [n = 15], HES sepsis [n = 15]) or human albumin 20% (HA trauma [n = 15], HA sepsis [n = 15]) over 5 days to keep pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) between 12 and 18 mm Hg. Cardiorespiratory variables were measured by a pulmonary artery catheter on the day of inclusion into the study and daily during the next 5 days. Gastric intramucosal pH (pHi) was measured by tonometry. Central venous pressure and PCWP were comparable within the subgroups (trauma/sepsis) throughout the entire study period. In the trauma patients, cardiac index (CI), oxygen consumption index (VO2I), and oxygen delivery index (DO2I), significantly increased only in the HES-treated patients. In the sepsis patients, CI, VO2I, and DO2I increased and remained higher than baseline only in the HES group (P < 0.01). Right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) was reduced (< 40%) in the HA patients and increased only in the HES patients (from 34% +/- 4% to 42% +/- 3%; P < 0.05). pHi remained normal (> 7.35) in both trauma groups and in the HES-treated sepsis patients. In the HA sepsis group, pH, decreased (> 7.20) within the study period (7.15 +/- 0.12 on Day 4), indicating deteriorated splanchnic perfusion. We conclude that long-term intravascular fluid therapy with HA in traumatized and sepsis patients has no advantages in comparison to LMW-HES. In both groups, volume replacement with HES even resulted in improved systemic hemodynamics. Decrease in pHi in the sepsis patients was blunted by HES infusion indicating improved splanchnic perfusion by this regimen of volume therapy.
充足的血管内液体治疗对危重症患者的治疗至关重要。本研究评估了用低分子(LMW)羟乙基淀粉溶液(HES)进行长期容量替代的心肺反应是否与用人白蛋白(HA)的不同。按照随机序列,30例创伤患者(损伤严重度评分[ISS]在15至30之间)和30例脓毒症患者(继发于大的普外科手术)在5天内接受10% HES(平均分子量200,000道尔顿;创伤HES组[n = 15],脓毒症HES组[n = 15])或20%人白蛋白(创伤HA组[n = 15],脓毒症HA组[n = 15]),以维持肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)在12至18 mmHg之间。在纳入研究当天以及接下来的5天每天,用肺动脉导管测量心肺变量。用张力测定法测量胃黏膜内pH(pHi)。在整个研究期间,各亚组(创伤/脓毒症)内中心静脉压和PCWP具有可比性。在创伤患者中,仅接受HES治疗的患者心脏指数(CI)、氧消耗指数(VO2I)和氧输送指数(DO2I)显著增加。在脓毒症患者中,仅HES组的CI、VO2I和DO2I增加且仍高于基线(P < 0.01)。HA组患者右心室射血分数(RVEF)降低(< 40%),仅HES组患者升高(从34%±4%升至42%±3%;P < 0.05)。两个创伤组以及接受HES治疗的脓毒症患者pHi均保持正常(> 7.35)。在HA脓毒症组,研究期间pH降低(> 7.20)(第4天为7.15±0.12),表明内脏灌注恶化。我们得出结论,与LMW - HES相比,在创伤和脓毒症患者中用HA进行长期血管内液体治疗没有优势。在两组中,用HES进行容量替代甚至导致全身血流动力学改善。HES输注减轻了脓毒症患者pHi的降低,表明这种容量治疗方案改善了内脏灌注。