Teusink B, Bakker B M, Westerhoff H V
E.C. Slater Institute, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996 Jul 31;1275(3):204-12. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(96)00026-6.
The three main existing models for glycolytic oscillations in yeast were re-examined to investigate how these oscillations are controlled. We implemented the operational definitions provided by metabolic control analysis to quantify the control properties of enzymes with regard to glycolytic oscillations. In all three models, the control of the frequency and that of the amplitudes of the metabolites were distributed among the enzymes. There was no obvious correlation between the control of the average flax and the control of the frequency. Most importantly, the so-called 'oscillophore' of the system, traditionally the enzyme primarily held responsible for the generation of the oscillation, was not the only controlling step. We conclude that just like steady-state flux control is not necessarily limited to a rate-limiting step, oscillations are not dictated by a single 'oscillophore'.
为了研究酵母中糖酵解振荡是如何被控制的,我们重新审视了现有的三种主要的糖酵解振荡模型。我们采用代谢控制分析提供的操作定义来量化酶对糖酵解振荡的控制特性。在所有这三种模型中,代谢物频率的控制和振幅的控制分布在各种酶之间。平均通量的控制与频率的控制之间没有明显的相关性。最重要的是,该系统中传统上被认为主要负责产生振荡的所谓“振荡子”酶,并不是唯一的控制步骤。我们得出结论,就像稳态通量控制不一定局限于限速步骤一样,振荡也不是由单个“振荡子”决定的。