Dormans T P, Huige R M, Gerlag P G
Department of Internal Medicine, St Joseph Hospital, Veldhoven, Netherlands.
Heart. 1996 Apr;75(4):349-51. doi: 10.1136/hrt.75.4.349.
To assess the benefits and problems of chronic intermittent treatment with haemofiltration or haemodialysis or both in patients with severe chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) and oedema refractory to pharmacological treatment.
A retrospective case-cohort study. A general hospital in The Netherlands.
The results of chronic intermittent treatment with haemofiltration (n = 10) or haemodialysis (n = 2) were analysed in patients with severe chronic heart failure, predominantly due to coronary heart disease, and oedema refractory to a pharmacological regimen including high dose frusemide.
Patients had an average of 25 (SD 38) treatments.
There was improvement of NYHA class IV to III in seven patients. However, this was not reflected in a decrease in hospital admission: only two patients could be managed as outpatients. The median survival after start of the treatment was 24 days (varying from 0 to 393 days). In four patients the treatment was discontinued after discussion with the patient and family.
The use of chronic intermittent haemofiltration and haemodialysis is of limited value in end stage chronic heart failure with oedema, refractory to maximal conventional treatment.
评估对重度慢性心力衰竭(纽约心脏病协会III或IV级)且对药物治疗难治性水肿患者进行血液滤过或血液透析或两者联合的慢性间歇性治疗的益处和问题。
一项回顾性病例队列研究。荷兰的一家综合医院。
分析了重度慢性心力衰竭患者(主要因冠心病所致)采用血液滤过(n = 10)或血液透析(n = 2)进行慢性间歇性治疗的结果,这些患者对包括大剂量速尿在内的药物治疗方案难治性水肿。
患者平均接受了25次(标准差38)治疗。
7例患者纽约心脏病协会分级从IV级改善至III级。然而,这并未体现在住院次数减少上:仅2例患者可作为门诊患者处理。治疗开始后的中位生存期为24天(范围从0至393天)。4例患者在与患者及家属讨论后停止了治疗。
对于终末期慢性心力衰竭伴难治性水肿且对最大程度常规治疗无效的患者,采用慢性间歇性血液滤过和血液透析的价值有限。