Yaruss J S, Conture E G
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Apr;39(2):349-64. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3902.349.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the Covert Repair Hypothesis (CRH; Postma & Kolk, 1993), a theory designed to account for the occurrence of speech disfluencies in adults who stutter, can also account for selected speech characteristics of children who stutter and demonstrate disordered phonology. Subjects were 9 boys who stutter and exhibit normal phonology (S + NP; mean age = 61.33 months; SD = 10.16 months) and 9 boys who stutter and exhibit disordered phonology (S + DP; mean age = 59.11 months; SD = 9.37 months). Selected aspects of each child's speech fluency and phonology were analyzed on the basis of an audio/videotaped picture-naming task and a 30-min conversational interaction with his mother. Results indicated that S + NP and S + DP children are generally comparable in terms of their basic speech disfluency, nonsystematic speech error, and self-repair behaviors. CRH predictions that utterances produced with faster articulatory speaking rates or shorter response time latencies are more likely to contain speech errors or speech disfluencies were not supported. CRH predictions regarding the co-occurrence of speech disfluencies and speech errors were supported for nonsystematic ("slip-of-the-tongue"), but not for systematic (phonological process/rule-bases), speech errors. Furthermore, neither S + NP nor S + DP subjects repaired their systematic speech errors during conversational speech, suggesting that systematic deviations from adult forms may not represent true "errors, " at least for some children exhibiting phonological processes. Findings suggest that speech disfluencies may not represent by-products of self-repairs of systematic speech errors produced during conversational speech, but that self-repairs of nonsystematic speech errors may be related to children's production of speech disfluencies.
本研究的目的是评估隐性修复假说(CRH;波斯特马和科尔克,1993)——一种旨在解释口吃成年人言语不流畅现象的理论——是否也能解释口吃儿童的某些言语特征,并证明其存在语音障碍。研究对象为9名口吃且语音正常的男孩(S + NP;平均年龄 = 61.33个月;标准差 = 10.16个月)和9名口吃且存在语音障碍的男孩(S + DP;平均年龄 = 59.11个月;标准差 = 9.37个月)。基于音频/录像的图片命名任务以及与母亲进行的30分钟对话互动,对每个孩子言语流畅性和语音的选定方面进行了分析。结果表明,在基本言语不流畅、非系统性言语错误和自我修复行为方面,S + NP组和S + DP组儿童总体上具有可比性。CRH的预测,即发音语速较快或反应时间较短时说出的话语更有可能包含言语错误或言语不流畅,未得到支持。CRH关于言语不流畅和言语错误同时出现的预测,对于非系统性(“口误”)言语错误得到了支持,但对于系统性(基于语音过程/规则)言语错误则未得到支持。此外,S + NP组和S + DP组的受试者在对话言语中均未修复其系统性言语错误,这表明与成人形式的系统性偏差可能并不代表真正的“错误”,至少对于一些表现出语音过程的儿童来说是这样。研究结果表明,言语不流畅可能并不代表对话言语中产生的系统性言语错误自我修复的副产品,但非系统性言语错误的自我修复可能与儿童言语不流畅的产生有关。