• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Follow-up study of Finnish volunteer oocyte donors concerning their attitudes to oocyte donation.

作者信息

Söderström-Anttila V

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Central Hospital of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 1995 Nov;10(11):3073-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135852.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135852
PMID:8747077
Abstract

A questionnaire was sent to the first 30 Finnish volunteer oocyte donors at 12-18 months after donation to determine their experiences concerning treatment and attitudes to donation. All donations were carried out anonymously and without payment. The donors were recruited by advertising in newspapers. Most donors were very satisfied with the experience. The side-effects of the treatment had been slight and tolerable. In all, 85% of the respondents reported no gynaecological problems afterwards. The problems reported by the other 15% were minor and unrelated to the donation. A total of 67% of the respondents would have liked to have known if pregnancy had been achieved in the recipient, and 89% reported that they had thought about the possibility of a child from their donation. Some 42% of the respondents preferred to receive no information concerning either the child or the recipient couple. Of the respondents, 59% thought the offspring should be told about its origin and 33% thought the child should be given identifying information about the donor. About half of the others would agree to the release of non-identifying information. In all, 96% of the respondents reported that their own feelings were sufficiently taken into consideration during the treatment and 78% would donate again. No-one regretted their donation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Follow-up study of Finnish volunteer oocyte donors concerning their attitudes to oocyte donation.
Hum Reprod. 1995 Nov;10(11):3073-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135852.
2
Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.匿名捐卵者和身份公开捐卵者对未来与捐卵后代接触的态度。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Apr 1;34(4):672-678. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez009.
3
Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors.利他性匿名、身份公开和已知的卵母细胞捐赠者的短期和长期健康后果及当前满意度水平。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Mar;31(3):597-606. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev324. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
4
Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors' experiences.
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Jun;25(2):145-51. doi: 10.1080/1674820400002261.
5
Views of French oocyte donors at least 3 years after donation.捐卵 3 年后法国捐卵者的看法。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Jun;40(6):819-826. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
6
Socio-demographic and fertility-related characteristics and motivations of oocyte donors in eleven European countries.欧洲11个国家卵母细胞捐赠者的社会人口学特征、生育相关特征及动机
Hum Reprod. 2014 May;29(5):1076-89. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu048. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
7
Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.瑞典不同女性群体对卵子捐赠和卵子研究的态度。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Mar;77(3):317-21.
8
A follow-up study of the long-term satisfaction, reproductive experiences, and self-reported health status of oocyte donors in Spain.西班牙卵母细胞捐赠者长期满意度、生殖经历及自我报告健康状况的随访研究
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Jun;24(3):227-232. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1588960. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
9
Characterization of potential oocyte donors in Sweden.瑞典潜在卵母细胞捐献者的特征分析。
Hum Reprod. 2003 Oct;18(10):2205-15. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg398.
10
[Oocyte donation: parents's secrets and lies].[卵子捐赠:父母的秘密与谎言]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2005 Oct;34(6):557-67. doi: 10.1016/s0368-2315(05)82880-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Stringent Regulations of Oocyte Donation Among Jewish Women in Israel: Characteristics and Outcomes of the National Oocyte Donation Program in One Central IVF Unit.以色列犹太女性卵子捐赠的严格规定:一个中心体外受精单元国家卵子捐赠项目的特征与结果
J Relig Health. 2025 Feb;64(1):124-147. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02200-7. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
Disposition preferences in oocyte preservation patients.卵母细胞保存患者的处置偏好。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Jul;39(7):1619-1624. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02518-9. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Oocyte donors’ awareness on donation procedure and risks: A call for developing guidelines for health tourism in oocyte donation programmes.
卵母细胞捐赠者对捐赠程序和风险的认知:呼吁制定卵母细胞捐赠计划中的健康旅游指南。
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2019 Nov 28;20(4):236-242. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0110. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
4
Attitudes toward oocyte donation among medical and nursing students and couples who have recently become parents: A Swedish study.医学和护理专业学生以及刚成为父母的夫妇对卵子捐赠的态度:一项瑞典的研究。
Reprod Med Biol. 2008 Dec 7;7(4):161-168. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2008.00214.x. eCollection 2008 Dec.
5
Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.全国一批身份公开的卵母细胞和精子捐赠者对信息披露的态度及其与捐赠后代的关系。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Sep;29(9):1978-86. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu152. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
6
Advocating for longitudinal follow-up of the health and welfare of egg donors.倡导对卵子捐赠者的健康和福利进行长期跟踪。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Sep;102(3):662-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.037. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
7
Gamete donors' satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample.配子捐赠者的满意度;全国样本中卵母细胞和精子捐赠者的性别差异和相似性。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Sep;92(9):1049-56. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12156. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
8
The reduction of sperm donor candidates due to the abolition of the anonymity rule: analysis of an argument.由于匿名规则的废除导致精子捐献候选者数量减少:一项论证分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 Nov;18(11):617-22. doi: 10.1023/a:1013169207315.
9
Understanding differences in the perception of anonymous parties: a comparison between gamete donors and their recipients.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000 Feb;17(2):127-30. doi: 10.1023/a:1017257719479.