de Kok M E, Mertens P L, Cuijpers C E, Swaen G M, Wesseling G J, Broer J, Sturmans F, Wouters E F
Institut für Hygiene and Umweltmedizin, Aachen, Germany.
Eur J Pediatr. 1996 Jun;155(6):506-11. doi: 10.1007/BF01955191.
A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate possible interregional differences in respiratory health in primary school children living in two different towns of the Netherlands, Melick/Herkenbosch Asenray (MHA) (n = 511) and Leek (LK) (n = 612). The prevalence of respiratory symptoms was determined by means of a questionnaire and respiratory impedance was measures using the forced oscillation technique (FOT). Respiratory symptoms were reported consistently more often in MHA than in LK; chronic cough (17% MHA vs 5% LK), shortness of breath (15% vs 8%), wheeze (16% vs 13%) and attacks of shortness of breath with wheeze (10% vs 7%). However, doctor-diagnosed asthma was reported as 7% in MHA and 6% in LK. The prevalence rates expressed as odds ratios of MHA versus LK were all > 1 even when adjusted for known indoor environmental factors. Living in MHA appeared to be a statistically significant determinant of the reported symptom prevalence. Furthermore, the child's age, maternal smoking (> 10 cigarettes/day), and having had domestic animals were positively associated with one or more respiratory symptoms. Calculating adjusted differences in respiratory impedance between the regions resulted in a small but statistically significant difference in resonant frequency, LK being slightly at a disadvantage. Measured outdoor air pollution levels of SO2, NO2, O3 and PM10 were in general higher in MHA. In both regions however, the average levels remained below the present WHO guidelines, except for NO2 in MHA where the guideline was slightly exceeded.
In this study prevalence rates of key symptoms of asthma were found to be significantly higher in children living in one region of the Netherlands (MHA) compared to another (LK). Known (indoor) risk factors for respiratory disease could not explain the observed differences in symptom prevalence between the regions. However, statistically but not clinically significant interregional differences in respiratory impedance values were found between children living in MHA and children living in LK. Further research will have to incorporate techniques to evaluate the potential influence of information bias.
开展了一项横断面研究,以评估生活在荷兰两个不同城镇(梅利克/赫肯博施阿森雷(MHA),n = 511;利克(LK),n = 612)的小学生呼吸健康方面可能存在的区域间差异。通过问卷调查确定呼吸道症状的患病率,并使用强迫振荡技术(FOT)测量呼吸阻抗。MHA地区报告的呼吸道症状始终比LK地区更频繁;慢性咳嗽(MHA为17%,LK为5%)、呼吸急促(15%对8%)、喘息(16%对13%)以及伴有喘息的呼吸急促发作(10%对7%)。然而,医生诊断的哮喘在MHA地区报告为7%,在LK地区报告为6%。即使在对已知的室内环境因素进行调整后,以MHA与LK的比值比表示的患病率均>1。生活在MHA地区似乎是报告症状患病率的一个具有统计学意义的决定因素。此外,儿童年龄、母亲吸烟(>10支/天)以及饲养家畜与一种或多种呼吸道症状呈正相关。计算两个地区之间呼吸阻抗的调整差异导致共振频率存在微小但具有统计学意义的差异(LK地区略处劣势)。MHA地区测量的室外二氧化硫、二氧化氮、臭氧和细颗粒物(PM10)空气污染水平总体上更高。然而,在两个地区,除了MHA地区的二氧化氮略超过指南值外,平均水平均保持在世界卫生组织目前的指南以下。
在本研究中,发现生活在荷兰一个地区(MHA)的儿童哮喘关键症状的患病率显著高于另一个地区(LK)。已知的(室内)呼吸道疾病风险因素无法解释各地区之间观察到的症状患病率差异。然而,在生活在MHA地区的儿童和生活在LK地区的儿童之间发现了呼吸阻抗值在统计学上但非临床上的显著区域间差异。进一步的研究将必须纳入评估信息偏倚潜在影响技术。