• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任的概念分析

A concept analysis of trust.

作者信息

Johns J L

机构信息

Tidewater Community College, Quinby, Virginia 23423, USA.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 1996 Jul;24(1):76-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.16310.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.16310.x
PMID:8807380
Abstract

Trust is an important and pervasive concept. In nursing, it has been considered primarily from two perspectives. Clinically, it is an important aspect of the nurse-patient relationship. Organizationally, trust is associated with various outcomes and levels of effectiveness. Much of the nursing literature that discusses trust relies upon vague conceptualizations or borrows from other disciplines. The absence of a clear conceptualization of trust has been cited. A core concept of trust is presented which is applicable to nursing in both clinical and organizational settings. Established methods for concept analysis are supplemented by a sequential step model developed by the author. The concept is developed as both process and outcome, and the relationships of the two states to measurement of the concept are identified. The utilization of the core concept in context-specific instances is discussed, and suggestions are made for further research.

摘要

信任是一个重要且普遍存在的概念。在护理领域,主要从两个角度对其进行考量。在临床方面,它是护患关系的一个重要方面。在组织层面,信任与各种结果及成效水平相关。许多探讨信任的护理文献依赖于模糊的概念界定或借鉴其他学科的内容。有人指出缺乏对信任的清晰概念界定。本文提出了一个适用于临床和组织环境下护理工作的信任核心概念。作者开发的一个循序渐进的模型对既定的概念分析方法进行了补充。该概念既被视为过程,也被视为结果,并确定了这两种状态与该概念衡量之间的关系。文中讨论了该核心概念在特定情境中的应用,并对进一步研究提出了建议。

相似文献

1
A concept analysis of trust.信任的概念分析
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Jul;24(1):76-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.16310.x.
2
[Analysis of the concept of care/caring-structure of attributes identified from qualitative and quantitative research].[对从定性和定量研究中确定的护理概念/护理属性结构的分析]
Seiroka Kango Daigaku Kiyo. 1996;22:14-28.
3
The Value of Trust to Nursing.信任对护理工作的价值。
Nurs Econ. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):283-8; 327; quiz 289.
4
A concept analysis of nurse-patient trust.护患信任的概念分析
Br J Nurs. 2009;18(1):46-51. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.1.32091.
5
The impact of nursing on patient and organizational outcomes.护理对患者及组织成果的影响。
Nurs Econ. 2007 Jan-Feb;25(1):30-4, 3.
6
[Integrating relationship management with clinical management].将关系管理与临床管理相结合
Soins. 2003 Dec(681):30-1.
7
[Relationship care or relation of care?].[关系性照护还是照护关系?]
Soins. 2003 Dec(681):34-6.
8
Clarification of conceptualizations of empathy.共情概念的澄清。
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Aug;35(3):317-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01848.x.
9
Hindrance for patient participation in nursing care.患者参与护理的障碍。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2005 Sep;19(3):223-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00336.x.
10
Is practical nursing experience necessary in administration, education, and research?实践护理经验在管理、教育和研究中是必要的吗?
West J Nurs Res. 1999 Feb;21(1):83-93. doi: 10.1177/01939459922043721.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the Trust in Multidimensional Healthcare Systems Scale (TIMHSS).多维医疗保健系统信任量表(TIMHSS)的开发和验证。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 May 8;23(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02162-y.
2
How do Registered Nurses Understand Followership?注册护士如何理解追随者的角色?
Can J Nurs Res. 2023 Dec;55(4):437-446. doi: 10.1177/08445621231173793. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
To join the rebuild or not? An exploration of the factors influencing the public's intention to participate in urban renewal.是否参与重建?影响公众参与城市更新意愿因素的探索。
Sci Prog. 2022 Oct-Dec;105(4):368504221140273. doi: 10.1177/00368504221140273.
4
The Development of Overtrust: An Empirical Simulation and Psychological Analysis in the Context of Human-Robot Interaction.过度信任的发展:人机交互背景下的实证模拟与心理分析
Front Robot AI. 2021 Apr 13;8:554578. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.554578. eCollection 2021.
5
Effects of nursing power and organizational trust on nurse's responsiveness and orientation to patient needs.护理能力和组织信任对护士响应和关注患者需求的影响。
Nurs Open. 2020 Jul 26;7(6):1807-1814. doi: 10.1002/nop2.567. eCollection 2020 Nov.
6
'I don't want anyone to know': Experiences of obtaining access to HIV testing by Eastern European, non-European Union sex workers in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.“我不想让任何人知道”:在荷兰阿姆斯特丹,东欧非欧盟性工作者获得 HIV 检测服务的经历。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 7;15(7):e0234551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234551. eCollection 2020.
7
Shared Decision-Making for Nursing Practice: An Integrative Review.护理实践中的共同决策:一项综合综述。
Open Nurs J. 2018 Jan 22;12:1-14. doi: 10.2174/1874434601812010001. eCollection 2018.
8
Trust in healthcare settings: Scale development, methods, and preliminary determinants.医疗机构中的信任:量表开发、方法及初步决定因素
SAGE Open Med. 2016 Sep 1;4:2050312116664224. doi: 10.1177/2050312116664224. eCollection 2016.
9
'I Used to Fight with Them but Now I Have Stopped!': Conflict and Doctor-Nurse-Anaesthetists' Motivation in Maternal and Neonatal Care Provision in a Specialist Referral Hospital.“我过去常和他们争吵,但现在我已经停止了!”:专科医院孕产妇和新生儿护理中的冲突以及医生、护士和麻醉师的动机
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 18;10(8):e0135129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135129. eCollection 2015.
10
Trust in the medical profession: conceptual and measurement issues.对医疗行业的信任:概念与测量问题。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1419-39. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.01070.