• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The effect of an educational intervention on the perceived risk of breast cancer.

作者信息

Alexander N E, Ross J, Sumner W, Nease R F, Littenberg B

机构信息

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Feb;11(2):92-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02599584.

DOI:10.1007/BF02599584
PMID:8833016
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To appraise women's perceived risk of developing breast cancer and the effects of a physician's educational intervention on this perception.

DESIGN

Longitudinal before-and-after study involving four measures of participants risk of developing breast cancer. Eligible women provided the data needed to calculate an objective estimate of their individual risk of developing breast cancer before age 80 using the Gail formula. They also provided a subjective estimate of their individual perceived risk. Then, each participant met with a general internal medicine physician who provided personalized information and education. Immediately after education, and again several months later, we reassessed each woman's perceived risk.

SETTING

Physicians office.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 59 women participating in the Tamoxifen Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. Twenty-nine women returned for the follow-up risk assessment.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The median calculated risk of breast cancer before age 80 (by the Gail formula) was 15%, but the median perceived risk before educational intervention was 50%. The perceived risk after educational intervention fell to 25%. At late follow-up, the median perceived risk remained at 25%. The difference between the preeducational perceptions and the calculated estimates was significant (1) < .0001). After educational intervention, perceived risk measures shifted closer to the calculated value, but still remained significantly higher (p <.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Women often substantially overestimate their chances of getting breast cancer. Educational intervention by a physician, including explanation of an individual's calculated risk, can reduce this error. The effect of education appears to persist at least for several months.

摘要

相似文献

1
The effect of an educational intervention on the perceived risk of breast cancer.
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Feb;11(2):92-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02599584.
2
Women's views on chemoprevention of breast cancer: qualitative study.女性对乳腺癌化学预防的看法:定性研究
Can Fam Physician. 2006 May;52(5):624-5.
3
Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making.有乳腺癌家族史的健康女性:定制的遗传咨询干预对风险认知、知识及绝经治疗决策的影响
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Sep;15(7):843-56. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.843.
4
Perceived risk of breast cancer among women at average and increased risk.平均风险及风险增加的女性群体对乳腺癌的感知风险
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Nov;14(9):845-51. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.845.
5
Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: are they accurate?女性对乳腺癌风险的认知:准确吗?
Can J Public Health. 2003 Nov-Dec;94(6):422-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03405078.
6
Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age.50岁以下女性对乳腺癌风险及筛查效果的认知
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 May 17;87(10):720-31. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.10.720.
7
Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: how you ask matters.女性对乳腺癌风险的认知:提问方式很重要。
Med Decis Making. 1999 Jul-Sep;19(3):221-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900301.
8
Breast cancer risk elements and nurse practitioners' knowledge, use, and perceived comfort level of breast cancer risk assessment.乳腺癌风险因素以及执业护士对乳腺癌风险评估的知识、应用和感知舒适度
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2009 May;21(5):270-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00405.x.
9
Women's perceptions of the effectiveness of telephone support and education on their adjustment to breast cancer.女性对电话支持及教育在其适应乳腺癌过程中有效性的认知。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006 Jan 1;33(1):138-44. doi: 10.1188/06.ONF.138-144.
10
Communicating breast cancer risks to women using different formats.使用不同形式向女性传达乳腺癌风险。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Aug;10(8):895-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The accuracy of breast cancer risk self-assessment does not correlate with knowledge about breast cancer and knowledge and attitudes towards primary chemoprevention.乳腺癌风险自我评估的准确性与乳腺癌知识以及对一级化学预防的知识和态度无关。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Oct 20;20:101229. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101229. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Perceptions of Cancer Risk: Differences by Weight Status.对癌症风险的认知:因体重状况而异
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Jun;32(2):357-363. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0942-9.
3
eCROPS-CA: a systematic approach toward effective and sustainable cancer prevention in rural China.

本文引用的文献

1
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
2
Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer.乳腺癌高危女性的乳腺钼靶检查依从性与心理困扰
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Jul 7;85(13):1074-80. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.13.1074.
3
Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer.有乳腺癌家族史女性的风险认知。
中国农村有效且可持续癌症预防的系统方法:eCROPS-CA
BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 8;15:233. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1253-6.
4
Impact of Prophylactic Mastectomy in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers.预防性乳房切除术对 BRCA1/2 突变携带者的影响。
Breast Care (Basel). 2014 Dec;9(6):385-9. doi: 10.1159/000369592.
5
The construct of breast cancer risk perception: need for a better risk communication?乳腺癌风险认知的构建:是否需要更好的风险沟通?
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2009;1(2):122-9.
6
Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule to identify suspected breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.用于识别疑似乳腺癌的临床预测规则的开发与验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2014 Oct 3;14:743. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-743.
7
Establishing a program for individuals at high risk for breast cancer.为乳腺癌高危个体建立项目。
J Cancer. 2013 Jul 1;4(5):433-46. doi: 10.7150/jca.6481. Print 2013.
8
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.关于进行筛查测试的明智决策的个性化风险沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD001865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.pub3.
9
United States trends in the surgical treatment of primary breast cancer.美国原发性乳腺癌外科治疗的趋势。
World J Surg. 2012 Jul;36(7):1475-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1469-4.
10
Perceived cancer risk among American Indians: implications for intervention research.美国印第安人对癌症风险的认知:干预研究的意义。
Ethn Dis. 2010 Autumn;20(4):458-62.
Br J Cancer. 1993 Mar;67(3):612-4. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.112.
4
Risk perception and communication.风险认知与沟通。
Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:183-203. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.001151.
5
Validation studies on a model for breast cancer risk.乳腺癌风险模型的验证研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Apr 20;86(8):573-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.8.573.
6
Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility.关于乳腺癌-卵巢癌易感性基因检测的态度。
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Apr;12(4):843-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.4.843.
7
Validation of the Gail et al. model for predicting individual breast cancer risk.盖尔等人预测个体乳腺癌风险模型的验证
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Apr 20;86(8):600-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.8.600.
8
Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.乳腺癌筛查国际研讨会报告
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Oct 20;85(20):1644-56. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.20.1644.
9
When numbers get serious.
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 May;9(5):295-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02599661.
10
How age, outcome severity, and scale influence general medicine clinic patients' interpretations of verbal probability terms.年龄、结果严重程度和量表如何影响普通内科门诊患者对口头概率术语的理解。
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 May;9(5):268-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02599654.