Pawlotsky J M, Hovanessian A G, Roudot-Thoraval F, Robert N, Bouvier M, Babany G, Duval J, Dhumeaux D
Department of Bacteriology and Virology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris XII, France.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Feb;40(2):320-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.2.320.
Alpha interferon (IFN-alpha) is, to date, the only treatment with proven efficacy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. However, less than 15% of the patients have a sustained response to IFN-alpha. Interferon acts through the induction of various cellular enzymes. Among them, the 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase (2-5OAS) is (at least in part) responsible for a direct antiviral effect of IFN-alpha. The aim of this study was to determine whether basal and IFN-alpha-induced in vivo and in vitro 2-5OAS activities measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells predict biochemical and virological responses to IFN-alpha in patients with chronic hepatitis C. 2-5OAS activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the antiviral effect of IFN-alpha were studied in 36 patients with chronic hepatitis C (27 men and 9 women; mean age, 44.7 years). Basal in vivo 2-5OAS activity (mean +/- standard error of the mean) was 4.41 +/- 0.69 nmol/10(6) cells. It was significantly induced at month 3 of IFN-alpha therapy (18.07 +/- 2.74 nmol/10(6) cells; P = 0.0001). No significant differences were found in basal in vivo 2-5OAS activities, in IFN-alpha-induced/basal in vitro 2-5OAS activity ratios, in IFN-alpha-induced in vivo 2-5OAS activities, and in IFN-alpha-induced/basal in vivo 2-5OAS activity ratios between the patients with and without a biochemical response (normal alanine aminotransferase activity in serum) or a virological response (normal alanine aminotransferase activity in serum and negative hepatitis C virus RNA detection) at any step of the study. At month 3 of therapy, p69, which is considered to be the active isoform of 2-5OAS, was induced, as demonstrated by Western blot (immunoblot) analysis in 50% of the patients, and induction of the p100 isoform was observed in 70% of the patients. No significant relationship with the response to IFN-alpha therapy was observed. Our results suggest that a deficiency of the IFN-alpha-dependent 2-5OAS system, which could be genetically determined, is unlikely to be responsible for the failure to achieve biochemical and virological responses to IFN-alpha therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C.
α干扰素(IFN-α)是迄今为止在慢性丙型肝炎患者中唯一被证实有效的治疗方法。然而,不到15%的患者对IFN-α有持续应答。干扰素通过诱导多种细胞酶发挥作用。其中,2'-5'寡腺苷酸合成酶(2-5OAS)(至少部分)负责IFN-α的直接抗病毒作用。本研究的目的是确定在外周血单个核细胞中测量的基础及IFN-α诱导的体内和体外2-5OAS活性是否能预测慢性丙型肝炎患者对IFN-α的生化和病毒学应答。在36例慢性丙型肝炎患者(27例男性和9例女性;平均年龄44.7岁)中研究了外周血单个核细胞中的2-5OAS活性及IFN-α的抗病毒作用。基础体内2-5OAS活性(平均值±平均标准误)为4.41±0.69 nmol/10⁶细胞。在IFN-α治疗第3个月时其显著诱导(18.07±2.74 nmol/10⁶细胞;P = 0.0001)。在研究的任何阶段,有生化应答(血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶活性正常)或病毒学应答(血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶活性正常且丙型肝炎病毒RNA检测阴性)的患者与无应答患者之间,基础体内2-5OAS活性、IFN-α诱导的/基础体外2-5OAS活性比值、IFN-α诱导的体内2-5OAS活性以及IFN-α诱导的/基础体内2-5OAS活性比值均未发现显著差异。在治疗第3个月时,通过蛋白质印迹(免疫印迹)分析证实,50%的患者诱导出了被认为是2-5OAS活性同工型的p69,70%的患者观察到了p100同工型的诱导。未观察到与IFN-α治疗应答的显著关系。我们的结果表明,IFN-α依赖性2-5OAS系统的缺陷(可能由基因决定)不太可能是慢性丙型肝炎患者对IFN-α治疗未能实现生化和病毒学应答的原因。