• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期家庭护理计划可能会减少慢性高碳酸血症性慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的住院次数。

Long-term home care programmes may reduce hospital admissions in COPD with chronic hypercapnia.

作者信息

Clini E, Vitacca M, Foglio K, Simoni P, Ambrosino N

机构信息

Salvatore Maugeri, Clinica del Lavoro Foundation IRCCS, Divisions of Pneumology, Medical Centers of Gussago (BS), Italy.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1996 Aug;9(8):1605-10. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09081605.

DOI:10.1183/09031936.96.09081605
PMID:8866580
Abstract

Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) has been shown to improve survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The clinical effectiveness of long-term home mechanical ventilation (HMV) is still discussed, nevertheless both LTOT and HMV are often included in the home care programmes of these patients. To evaluate the effectiveness of home care programmes including either HMV or LTOT, 34 COPD patients were studied. They were admitted to either HMV (Group A: 12 males and 5 females, aged 62 +/- 5 yrs), or LTOT (Group B: 9 males and 8 females, aged 62 +/- 8 yrs). They were compared to a historical group (Group C: 19 males and 10 females, aged 67 +/- 16 yrs) performing only their usual standard LTOT during the same period. Spirometry, maximal inspiratory pressure and arterial blood gas values were assessed at baseline and at 6, 12 and 18 months of follow-up. Mortality rate and number of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and days of hospitalization were also assessed. Four out of 17 (23%) patients in Group A, 3 out of 17 (18%) in Group B, and 5 out of 29 (17%) in Group C died within 18 months. Of the lung function tests, only maximal inspiratory pressure in Group A showed a significant increase in the 18th month (50 +/- 4 to 56 +/- 7 cmH2O; p<0.01). In comparison to 18 months prior to the study, hospital admissions (from 2.2 +/- 0.6 to 1.3 +/- 1.1 and from 2.0 +/- 0.7 to 1.0 +/- 0.9 for Group A and B, respectively; p<0.005 for both), and days of hospitalization (from 60 +/- 34 to 34 +/- 40 and from 55 +/- 23 to 18 +/- 20 days in Group A and B, respectively; p<0.005 for both) significantly decreased only in the two groups submitted to the home care programme. We conclude that home care programmes may be effective in the long-term treatment of chronically hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in reducing hospital admissions.

摘要

长期氧疗(LTOT)已被证明可提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的生存率。长期家庭机械通气(HMV)的临床有效性仍在讨论中,不过LTOT和HMV通常都被纳入这些患者的家庭护理计划中。为了评估包括HMV或LTOT的家庭护理计划的有效性,对34例COPD患者进行了研究。他们被纳入HMV组(A组:12名男性和5名女性,年龄62±5岁)或LTOT组(B组:9名男性和8名女性,年龄62±8岁)。将他们与同期仅进行常规标准LTOT的历史组(C组:19名男性和10名女性,年龄67±16岁)进行比较。在基线以及随访的6、12和18个月时评估肺活量测定、最大吸气压力和动脉血气值。还评估了死亡率、住院次数、重症监护病房(ICU)住院次数和住院天数。A组17例患者中有4例(23%)、B组17例患者中有3例(18%)、C组29例患者中有5例(17%)在18个月内死亡。在肺功能测试中,只有A组的最大吸气压力在第18个月时显示出显著增加(从50±4增至56±7 cmH2O;p<0.01)。与研究前18个月相比,仅接受家庭护理计划的两组患者的住院次数(A组从2.2±0.6降至1.3±1.1,B组从2.0±0.7降至1.0±0.9;两组p均<0.005)和住院天数(A组从60±34降至34±40天,B组从55±23降至18±20天;两组p均<0.005)显著减少。我们得出结论,家庭护理计划在长期治疗慢性高碳酸血症性慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者以减少住院次数方面可能是有效的。

相似文献

1
Long-term home care programmes may reduce hospital admissions in COPD with chronic hypercapnia.长期家庭护理计划可能会减少慢性高碳酸血症性慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的住院次数。
Eur Respir J. 1996 Aug;9(8):1605-10. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09081605.
2
The Italian multicentre study on noninvasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.意大利关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者无创通气的多中心研究。
Eur Respir J. 2002 Sep;20(3):529-38. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.02162001.
3
Outcome of COPD patients performing nocturnal non-invasive mechanical ventilation.
Respir Med. 1998 Oct;92(10):1215-22. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90424-3.
4
Home non-invasive mechanical ventilation and long-term oxygen therapy in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: comparison of costs.稳定期高碳酸血症慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的家庭无创机械通气与长期氧疗:成本比较
Respiration. 2009;77(1):44-50. doi: 10.1159/000127410. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
5
The appropriate setting of noninvasive pressure support ventilation in stable COPD patients.稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者无创压力支持通气的适宜设置
Chest. 2000 Nov;118(5):1286-93. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.5.1286.
6
COPD Home Oxygen Therapy and Home Mechanical Ventilation: Improving Admission-Free Survival in Persistent Hypercapnic COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病家庭氧疗和家庭机械通气:改善持续性高碳酸血症 COPD 患者的无住院生存率。
Chest. 2018 Jun;153(6):1499-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.03.053.
7
Long-term oxygen therapy vs long-term ventilatory assistance.长期氧疗与长期通气支持
Respir Care. 2000 Feb;45(2):178-85; discussion 186-7.
8
Domiciliary nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in severe COPD: effects on lung function and quality of life.重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的家庭经鼻间歇正压通气:对肺功能和生活质量的影响
Eur Respir J. 1997 Dec;10(12):2835-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10122835.
9
[A multi-centre randomized controlled trial of domiciliary non-invasive ventilation vs long-term oxygen therapy in survivors of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to COPD. Non-invasive ventilation in obstructive lung disease (NIVOLD) study].[一项关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病所致急性高碳酸血症呼吸衰竭幸存者家庭无创通气与长期氧疗的多中心随机对照试验。阻塞性肺疾病无创通气(NIVOLD)研究]
Rev Mal Respir. 2012 Nov;29(9):1141-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
10
Is There Any Additional Effect of Tele-Assistance on Long-Term Care Programmes in Hypercapnic COPD Patients? A Retrospective Study.远程协助对高碳酸血症型慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者长期护理项目是否有额外影响?一项回顾性研究。
COPD. 2016 Oct;13(5):576-82. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2016.1147542. Epub 2016 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Long-Term Oxygen Therapy on Reducing Rehospitalization of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.长期氧疗对降低慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者再住院率的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Pulm Ther. 2023 Jun;9(2):255-270. doi: 10.1007/s41030-023-00221-3. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
2
Supplemental oxygen and noninvasive ventilation.补充氧气和无创通气。
Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Mar 22;32(167). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0159-2022. Print 2023 Mar 31.
3
2022 Brazilian Thoracic Association recommendations for long-term home oxygen therapy.
2022 年巴西胸科协会关于长期家庭氧疗的建议。
J Bras Pneumol. 2022 Nov 4;48(5):e20220179. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20220179. eCollection 2022.
4
Home Non-Invasive Ventilation in COPD: A Global Systematic Review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的家庭无创通气:一项全球系统评价
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2022 Apr 29;9(2):237-251. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0242.
5
Using Telemedicine to Monitor the Patient with Chronic Respiratory Failure.使用远程医疗监测慢性呼吸衰竭患者。
Life (Basel). 2021 Oct 20;11(11):1113. doi: 10.3390/life11111113.
6
Patient's treatment burden related to care coordination in the field of respiratory diseases.患者在呼吸系统疾病领域与护理协调相关的治疗负担。
Breathe (Sheff). 2021 Mar;17(1):210006. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0006-2021.
7
Comparison home care service hospital-based care ulcer economic evaluation study.比较家庭护理服务、医院护理与溃疡的经济评估研究。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020 May 12;19(1):445-452. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00527-y. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Predicting and preventing hospital readmission for exacerbations of COPD.预测和预防慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重后的医院再入院情况。
ERJ Open Res. 2020 May 11;6(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00325-2019. eCollection 2020 Apr.
9
Integrated Care Intervention Supported by a Mobile Health Tool for Patients Using Noninvasive Ventilation at Home: Randomized Controlled Trial.家庭无创通气患者移动医疗工具支持的整合护理干预:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 13;8(4):e16395. doi: 10.2196/16395.
10
Association of Home Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation With Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.家庭无创正压通气与慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床结局的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 4;323(5):455-465. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22343.