Wieshmann U C, Free S L, Everitt A D, Bartlett P A, Barker G J, Tofts P S, Duncan J S, Shorvon S D, Stevens J M
Epilepsy Research Group, Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;61(4):357-61. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.61.4.357.
To assess the diagnostic value of the fast FLAIR sequence in patients with epilepsy.
One hundred and twenty eight patients with epilepsy and 10 control subjects were scanned with the fast FLAIR sequence with 5 mm slices, a coronal gradient echo (GRE) T1 weighted sequence with 1.5 mm slices and spin echo (SE) or fast spin echo (FSE) proton density and T2 weighted sequences with 5 mm slices. All images were compared by an unblinded neuroradiologist and neurologist. Fast FLAIR images of patients with hippocampal sclerosis (HS) and normal control subjects were also evaluated by two blinded independent raters.
Fast FLAIR provided a high conspicuity of neocortical damage, hamartomas, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumours, and clear cut hippocampal sclerosis. However, the same information could be obtained from the coronal T1 and T2 weighted images. In three patients fast FLAIR showed a clearly abnormal signal when SE T2 weighted images had not been definitely abnormal. Heterotopia was less conspicuous on fast FLAIR than GRE T1 weighted images. The two blinded raters detected all but one of the patients with clear cut hippocampal sclerosis on fast FLAIR images but missed all borderline cases of hippocampal atrophy and there were two false positives. Clear cut hippocampal sclerosis was more conspicuous on fast FLAIR images than on SE T2 weighted images in most patients, but additional patients were not identified.
Fast FLAIR has the advantage of identifying neocortical lesions and definite hippocampal sclerosis with a short scanning time and may also demonstrate lesions when other sequences are normal in a limited number of cases. The technique was not useful, however, for identifying mild hippocampal sclerosis or heterotopia.
评估快速液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)序列对癫痫患者的诊断价值。
对128例癫痫患者和10名对照者进行扫描,扫描序列包括层厚5mm的快速FLAIR序列、层厚1.5mm的冠状梯度回波(GRE)T1加权序列以及层厚5mm的自旋回波(SE)或快速自旋回波(FSE)质子密度加权和T2加权序列。所有图像均由一位未设盲的神经放射科医生和神经科医生进行比较。海马硬化(HS)患者和正常对照者的快速FLAIR图像也由两名独立的设盲评估者进行评估。
快速FLAIR序列对新皮质损伤、错构瘤、胚胎发育不良性神经上皮肿瘤以及明确的海马硬化具有较高的辨识度。然而,从冠状位T1加权和T2加权图像中也能获取相同信息。在3例患者中,当SE T2加权图像尚未明确显示异常时,快速FLAIR序列显示出明显异常信号。与GRE T1加权图像相比,快速FLAIR序列上的异位更不明显。两名设盲评估者在快速FLAIR图像上检测出了除1例之外的所有明确的海马硬化患者,但遗漏了所有海马萎缩的临界病例,并且有2例假阳性。在大多数患者中,明确的海马硬化在快速FLAIR图像上比在SE T2加权图像上更明显,但未识别出更多患者。
快速FLAIR序列具有在短扫描时间内识别新皮质病变和明确海马硬化的优势,并且在少数情况下,当其他序列正常时也可能显示病变。然而,该技术对于识别轻度海马硬化或异位并不有用。