Soto G E, Zhu Z, Evelhoch J L, Ackerman J J
Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 1996 Nov;36(5):698-704. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910360508.
Uncertainty regarding the intracellular/extracellular distribution of inorganic phosphate (P(i)) in tumors has raised concerns that pH calculated from the tumor P(i) chemical shift may not accurately represent the intracellular pH (pHin). This issue was addressed in subcutaneously transplanted murine radiation induced fibrosarcoma-1 by directly comparing pH measured via P(i) with pH measured via the in situ generated intracellular xenometabolite 2-deoxyglucose-6-phosphate (2DG6P). In 131 comparative measurements employing eight tumor-bearing mice under both control and hyperglycemic conditions (the latter to extend the range of tumor pH examined), the pH as derived from either 2DG6P or P(i) showed only a small, but statistically significant, difference (0.07 +/- 0.11 SD; P = 0.0001). Scatter in the comparative analysis over the pH range examined (ca. 5.5-7.5) was not uniform. Above pH 6.6, 2DG6P indicated a pH lower than that of P(i) by 0.088 +/- 0.105 SD (n = 107, P = 0.0001); below pH 6.6, 2DG6P indicated a pH essentially identical to and not statistically different from that of P(i) (mean difference 0.003 +/- 0.128 SD (n = 24, P = 0.92)). Evidence is presented in support of this differential arising from a systematic measurement error due to peak overlap between 2DG6P and endogenous phosphomonoester species. These results support the use of P(i) as a tumor 31P NMR pHin indicator, at least in RIF-1 tumors under control and hyperglycemic conditions.
肿瘤中无机磷酸盐(P(i))细胞内/细胞外分布的不确定性引发了人们的担忧,即根据肿瘤P(i)化学位移计算出的pH值可能无法准确代表细胞内pH值(pHin)。通过直接比较经P(i)测量的pH值与经原位生成的细胞内异源代谢物2-脱氧葡萄糖-6-磷酸(2DG6P)测量的pH值,在皮下移植的小鼠辐射诱导纤维肉瘤-1中解决了这个问题。在131次比较测量中,使用了八只荷瘤小鼠,分别处于对照和高血糖条件下(后者用于扩大所检测肿瘤pH值的范围),由2DG6P或P(i)得出的pH值仅显示出微小但具有统计学意义的差异(0.07±0.11标准差;P = 0.0001)。在所检测的pH值范围(约5.5 - 7.5)内,比较分析中的散点并不均匀。在pH 6.6以上,2DG6P显示的pH值比P(i)低0.088±0.105标准差(n = 107,P = 0.0001);在pH 6.6以下,2DG6P显示的pH值与P(i)基本相同且无统计学差异(平均差异0.003±0.128标准差(n = 24,P = 0.92))。有证据表明这种差异是由2DG6P与内源性磷酸单酯物种之间的峰重叠导致的系统测量误差引起的。这些结果支持将P(i)用作肿瘤31P NMR pHin指标,至少在对照和高血糖条件下的RIF-1肿瘤中如此。