• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估生活质量和健康状况测量工具:科学评审标准的制定

Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria.

作者信息

Lohr K N, Aaronson N K, Alonso J, Burnam M A, Patrick D L, Perrin E B, Roberts J S

机构信息

Health services and Policy Research Program, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1996 Sep-Oct;18(5):979-92. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80054-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80054-3
PMID:8930436
Abstract

The Medical Outcomes Trust is a depository and distributor of high-quality, standardized, health outcomes measurement instruments to national and international health communities. Every instrument in the Trust library is reviewed by the Scientific Advisory Committee against a rigorous set of eight attributes. These attributes consist of the following: (1) conceptual and measurement model; (2) reliability; (3) validity; (4) responsiveness; (5) interpretability; (6) respondent and administrative burden; (7) alternative forms; and (8) cultural and language adaptations. In addition to a full description of each attribute, we discuss uses of these criteria beyond evaluation of existing instruments and lessons learned in the first few rounds of instrument review against these criteria.

摘要

医学成果信托基金是向国内和国际卫生界提供高质量、标准化健康成果测量工具的存放和分发机构。信托基金库中的每一种工具都由科学咨询委员会根据一套严格的八项属性进行审查。这些属性包括:(1)概念和测量模型;(2)可靠性;(3)有效性;(4)反应性;(5)可解释性;(6)受访者和管理负担;(7)替代形式;(8)文化和语言适应性。除了对每个属性进行全面描述外,我们还讨论了这些标准在评估现有工具之外的用途,以及在前几轮根据这些标准进行工具审查中吸取的经验教训。

相似文献

1
Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria.评估生活质量和健康状况测量工具:科学评审标准的制定
Clin Ther. 1996 Sep-Oct;18(5):979-92. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80054-3.
2
Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.评估健康状况和生活质量的工具:属性与评审标准
Qual Life Res. 2002 May;11(3):193-205. doi: 10.1023/a:1015291021312.
3
[Health-related quality of life instruments and other patient-reported outcomes].[与健康相关的生活质量量表及其他患者报告结局]
Med Clin (Barc). 2005 Dec 1;125 Suppl 1:56-60. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(05)72211-9.
4
A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.通用生活质量量表的比较综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Jan;17(1):13-35. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017010-00002.
5
[Monitoring the use of health-related quality of life measurements in Korean studies of patients with diabetes].[监测韩国糖尿病患者研究中健康相关生活质量测量方法的使用情况]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2011 Aug;41(4):558-67. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2011.41.4.558.
6
Development of EMPRO: a tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures.EMPRO的开发:一种用于患者报告结局测量标准化评估的工具。
Value Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):700-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00309.x. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
7
Assessing quality of life in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments.评估前列腺癌患者的生活质量:现有工具的系统和标准化比较。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Oct;23(8):2169-81. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0678-8. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
8
Psychometric evaluation of condition-specific instruments used to assess health-related quality of life, attitudes, and related constructs in stuttering.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 Feb;17(1):60-80. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/006).
9
Cancer outcomes measurement: Through the lens of the Medical Outcomes Trust framework.癌症结局测量:透过医学结局信托框架的视角
Qual Life Res. 2007 Feb;16(1):143-64. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9116-x. Epub 2006 Nov 8.
10
Critical review of generic and dermatology-specific health-related quality of life instruments.对通用型及皮肤科专用的健康相关生活质量量表的批判性综述。
J Invest Dermatol. 2007 Dec;127(12):2726-39. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5701142. Epub 2007 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the cancer fatigue scale (CFS) in a UK population.癌症疲劳量表(CFS)在英国人群中的验证。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 28;25(1):1394. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14829-y.
2
Translation and validation of the Persian version of the global sleep assessment questionnaire in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者全球睡眠评估问卷波斯语版本的翻译与验证
Sleep Breath. 2025 Jun 7;29(3):206. doi: 10.1007/s11325-025-03371-7.
3
Refinement and Validation of a New Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Hearing Loss (My Hearing PREM).
一种新的听力损失患者报告体验测量方法(我的听力患者报告体验测量法,My Hearing PREM)的完善与验证
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70225. doi: 10.1111/hex.70225.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the unmet needs instrument for carers of people with dementia (UNI-C).痴呆症患者照料者未满足需求量表(UNI-C)的心理测量学评估。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Mar 11;9(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00856-7.
5
Construct validity and responsiveness of clinical upper limb measures and sensor-based arm use within the first year after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study.中风后第一年临床上肢测量和基于传感器的手臂使用的结构效度及反应度:一项纵向队列研究
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jan 29;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01512-9.
6
The test-retest reliability of frontal, sagittal, and transverse spinal measurements during three standing arm positions in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis measured using ultrasound imaging.使用超声成像测量特发性脊柱侧弯青少年在三种站立手臂姿势下脊柱前后位、矢状位和横断位测量的重测信度。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jan;34(1):225-233. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08576-0. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Nursing Student Contributions to Clinical Settings scale and analysis of factors influencing nurses' perceptions of nursing students' contributions: a cross-sectional study.中文版护理专业学生对临床环境贡献量表的心理测量学评价及影响护士对护理专业学生贡献认知的因素分析:一项横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 8;23(1):720. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02398-7.
8
Differences in Somatosensory Function Related to Hand Dominance: Results of a Quantitative Sensory Testing Study in Healthy Volunteers.与利手相关的躯体感觉功能差异:健康志愿者定量感觉测试研究结果
J Pain Res. 2024 Sep 5;17:2917-2928. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S470981. eCollection 2024.
9
Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the implementation of physical education programs in Chinese junior high schools.发展和验证评估中国初中体育课程实施情况的问卷。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 2;24(1):2387. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19844-5.
10
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Nordic Occupational Skin Symptoms Questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese.《北欧职业性皮肤症状问卷》的翻译及跨文化调适为巴西葡萄牙语版本。
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2024 Aug 5;22(1):e2022959. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2022-959. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.