Simpson J A, Rholes W S, Phillips D
Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4235, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Nov;71(5):899-914. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.5.899.
This study investigated how perceptions of current dating partners and relationships change after people with different attachment orientations attempt to resolve a problem in their relationship. Dating couples were videotaped while they tried to resolve either a major or a minor problem. Confirming predictions from attachment theory, men and women who had a more ambivalent orientation perceived their partner and relationship in relatively less positive terms after discussing a major problem. Observer ratings revealed that more ambivalent women who tried to resolve a major problem displayed particularly strong stress and anxiety and engaged in more negative behaviors. Conversely, men with a more avoidant orientation were rated as less warm and supportive, especially if they discussed a major problem. These results are discussed in terms of how highly ambivalent and highly avoidant people differentially perceive and respond to distressing events.
本研究调查了具有不同依恋取向的人在试图解决恋爱关系中的问题后,对当前约会伴侣和恋爱关系的看法是如何变化的。情侣们在尝试解决一个主要问题或一个次要问题时被录像。正如依恋理论所预测的那样,具有更强矛盾依恋取向的男性和女性在讨论一个主要问题后,对伴侣和恋爱关系的看法相对不那么积极。观察者评分显示,试图解决主要问题的矛盾依恋取向更强的女性表现出特别强烈的压力和焦虑,并表现出更多消极行为。相反,具有更强回避依恋取向的男性被评为缺乏温情和支持,尤其是在他们讨论一个主要问题时。我们从高度矛盾依恋和高度回避依恋的人如何以不同方式感知和应对令人痛苦的事件的角度讨论了这些结果。