Rogus J J, Krolewski A S
Joslin Diabetes Center, Section on Epidemiology and Genetics, Boston, MA 02215.
Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Dec;59(6):1376-81.
A common approach for detecting genetic linkage using siblings is to collect affected sib pairs (ASPs) and to identify markers where allele sharing exceeds expectation. Alternatively, markers can be analyzed in discordant sib pairs (DSPs) for allele sharing below expectation. Relative to the ASP approach, according to Risch, the power of the DSP approach increases with sibling recurrence risk, the two approaches being equally effective at 50% recurrence risk. However, with many diseases associated with more moderate sibling recurrence risk, less emphasis has been placed on the use of DSPs and the development of the underlying theory. In this paper, we expand the work of Risch to provide a more general foundation for DSP studies, since power can be quite high under the appropriate conditions. For example, in some highly affected populations, such as the diabetes-prone Pima Indians, sibling recurrence risk can be very large and, thus, DSPs ideal. Similarly, as we show through simulation, DSPs are preferable for diabetic nephropathy due to a 70% recurrence rate among siblings with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Following the diabetic nephropathy example, we consider more systematically the situations in which DSPs can provide an efficient alternative to ASPs.
一种利用兄弟姐妹来检测基因连锁的常见方法是收集患病同胞对(ASP),并识别等位基因共享超过预期的标记。或者,可以在不一致的同胞对(DSP)中分析标记,以找出等位基因共享低于预期的情况。根据里施的观点,相对于ASP方法,DSP方法的效能会随着兄弟姐妹复发风险的增加而提高,这两种方法在复发风险为50%时同样有效。然而,对于许多与中等程度的兄弟姐妹复发风险相关的疾病,人们对DSP的使用及其基础理论的发展关注较少。在本文中,我们扩展了里施的工作,为DSP研究提供更通用的基础,因为在适当条件下效能可能相当高。例如,在一些受影响程度很高的人群中,如易患糖尿病的皮马印第安人,兄弟姐妹的复发风险可能非常大,因此DSP是理想的选择。同样,正如我们通过模拟所表明的,由于胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者的兄弟姐妹中有70%的复发率,DSP对于糖尿病肾病来说更可取。以糖尿病肾病为例,我们更系统地考虑了DSP可以为ASP提供有效替代方案的情况。