Geer I, Westall C A
Visual Electrophysiology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital For Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 Sep;16(5):367-74.
The usefulness of the Cardiff Acuity Test in the detection of amblyopia was evaluated. Visual function was measured using pattern visual evoked potentials (VEPs), the Cardiff test, and the Bailey-Lovie Chart in 21 visually normal children and 12 children with amblyopia. The Cardiff test gave higher scores than the Bailey-Lovie test. The Cardiff test identified five of the 12 children who were classified as amblyopic by the Bailey-Lovie test. Interocular VEP latency differences identified eight of the 12 children with amblyopia; interocular VEP amplitudes correctly identified nine. We suggest that the challenging Bailey-Lovie test be used for older children who know their letters well. If the Bailey-Lovie test cannot be used, VEPs give the most accurate assessment of interocular differences. The Cardiff test holds a bored child's attention and allows the examiner to obtain a useful measure of visual acuity, but it cannot detect mild amounts of amblyopia.
对卡迪夫视力测试在弱视检测中的效用进行了评估。使用图形视觉诱发电位(VEP)、卡迪夫测试和贝利-洛维视力表对21名视力正常儿童和12名弱视儿童的视觉功能进行了测量。卡迪夫测试的得分高于贝利-洛维测试。卡迪夫测试识别出了12名被贝利-洛维测试归类为弱视儿童中的5名。双眼VEP潜伏期差异识别出了12名弱视儿童中的8名;双眼VEP振幅正确识别出了9名。我们建议,对于熟悉字母的大龄儿童,使用具有挑战性的贝利-洛维测试。如果无法使用贝利-洛维测试,VEP能最准确地评估双眼差异。卡迪夫测试能吸引注意力不集中的儿童,并让检查者获得有用的视力测量结果,但它无法检测出轻度弱视。