Suppr超能文献

比较用于确定弱视儿童视力缺陷的测试方法。

A comparison of tests to determine acuity deficits in children with amblyopia.

作者信息

Geer I, Westall C A

机构信息

Visual Electrophysiology Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital For Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 Sep;16(5):367-74.

PMID:8944181
Abstract

The usefulness of the Cardiff Acuity Test in the detection of amblyopia was evaluated. Visual function was measured using pattern visual evoked potentials (VEPs), the Cardiff test, and the Bailey-Lovie Chart in 21 visually normal children and 12 children with amblyopia. The Cardiff test gave higher scores than the Bailey-Lovie test. The Cardiff test identified five of the 12 children who were classified as amblyopic by the Bailey-Lovie test. Interocular VEP latency differences identified eight of the 12 children with amblyopia; interocular VEP amplitudes correctly identified nine. We suggest that the challenging Bailey-Lovie test be used for older children who know their letters well. If the Bailey-Lovie test cannot be used, VEPs give the most accurate assessment of interocular differences. The Cardiff test holds a bored child's attention and allows the examiner to obtain a useful measure of visual acuity, but it cannot detect mild amounts of amblyopia.

摘要

对卡迪夫视力测试在弱视检测中的效用进行了评估。使用图形视觉诱发电位(VEP)、卡迪夫测试和贝利-洛维视力表对21名视力正常儿童和12名弱视儿童的视觉功能进行了测量。卡迪夫测试的得分高于贝利-洛维测试。卡迪夫测试识别出了12名被贝利-洛维测试归类为弱视儿童中的5名。双眼VEP潜伏期差异识别出了12名弱视儿童中的8名;双眼VEP振幅正确识别出了9名。我们建议,对于熟悉字母的大龄儿童,使用具有挑战性的贝利-洛维测试。如果无法使用贝利-洛维测试,VEP能最准确地评估双眼差异。卡迪夫测试能吸引注意力不集中的儿童,并让检查者获得有用的视力测量结果,但它无法检测出轻度弱视。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验