Fanconi S, Tschupp A, Molinari L
University Children's Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
Eur J Pediatr. 1996 Dec;155(12):1043-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02532528.
Whereas during the last few years handling of the transcutaneous PO2 (tcPO2) and PCO2 (tcPCO2) sensor has been simplified, the high electrode temperature and the short application time remain major drawbacks. In order to determine whether the application of a topical metabolic inhibitor allows reliable measurement at a sensor temperature of 42 degrees C for a period of up to 12 h, we performed a prospective, open, nonrandomized study in a sequential sample of 20 critically ill neonates. A total of 120 comparisons (six repeated measurements per patient) between arterial and transcutaneous values were obtained. Transcutaneous values were measured with a control sensor at 44 degrees C (conventional contact medium, average application time 3 h) and a test sensor at 42 degrees C (Eugenol solution, average application time 8 h). Comparison of tcPO2 and PaO2 at 42 degrees C (Eugenol solution) showed a mean difference of +0.16 kPa (range +1.60 to -2.00 kPa), limits of agreement +1.88 and -1.56 kPa. Comparison of tcPO2 and PaO2 at 44 degrees C (control sensor) revealed a mean difference of +0.02 kPa (range +2.60 to -1.90 kPa), limits of agreement +2.12 and -2.08 kPa. Comparison of tcPCO2 and PaCO2 at 42 degrees C (Eugenol solution) showed a mean difference of +0.91 (range +2.30 to +0.10 kPa), limits of agreement +2.24 and -0.42 kPa. Comparison of tcPCO2 and PaCO2 at 44 degrees C (control sensor) revealed a mean difference of +0.63 kPa (range 1.50 to -0.30 kPa), limits of agreement +1.73 and -0.47 kPa.
Our results show that the use of an Eugenol solution allows reliable measurement of tcPO2 at a heating temperature of 42 degrees C; the application time can be prolongued up to a maximum of 12 h without aggravating the skin lesions. The performance of the tcPCO2 monitor was slightly worse at 42 degrees C than at 44 degrees C suggesting that for the Eugenol solution the metabolic offset should be corrected.
在过去几年中,经皮氧分压(tcPO₂)和二氧化碳分压(tcPCO₂)传感器的操作已得到简化,但电极温度高和应用时间短仍是主要缺点。为了确定局部应用代谢抑制剂是否能在传感器温度为42℃时进行长达12小时的可靠测量,我们对20例危重新生儿进行了一项前瞻性、开放性、非随机研究。共获得120次动脉值与经皮值之间的比较(每位患者重复测量6次)。经皮值用44℃的对照传感器(传统接触介质,平均应用时间3小时)和42℃的测试传感器(丁香酚溶液,平均应用时间8小时)测量。42℃(丁香酚溶液)时tcPO₂与动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)的比较显示平均差异为+0.16kPa(范围为+1.60至 -2.00kPa),一致性界限为+1.88和 -1.56kPa。44℃(对照传感器)时tcPO₂与PaO₂的比较显示平均差异为+0.02kPa(范围为+2.60至 -1.90kPa),一致性界限为+2.12和 -2.08kPa。42℃(丁香酚溶液)时tcPCO₂与动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)的比较显示平均差异为+0.91(范围为+2.30至+0.10kPa),一致性界限为+2.24和 -0.42kPa。44℃(对照传感器)时tcPCO₂与PaCO₂的比较显示平均差异为+0.63kPa(范围为1.50至 -0.30kPa),一致性界限为+1.