Mar C M, Smith D A, Sarter M
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1222, USA.
Br J Psychiatry. 1996 Dec;169(6):781-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.169.6.781.
Despite 30 years of research, some surprisingly fundamental gaps remain in our understanding of schizophrenic input dysfunctions.
In a provisional test of a 'hyperattention' hypothesis, schizophrenic patients and control subjects performed a behavioural test that was adapted from a paradigm originally developed for characterising vigilance or sustained attention in animals. On this computerised operant testing procedure, subjects discriminated between signals of various salience and non-signal presentations. Hits and correct rejections resulted in monetary rewards while misses and false alarms entailed monetary costs.
Data from in-patients with schizophrenia and age, education and gender-matched controls support hypotheses not only about hyperattentional dysfunctions in schizophrenia with respect to overall signal detectability but also in terms of resistance to the vigilance decrement that normally occurs over trials.
The theoretical importance of impairments of this sort are discussed with respect to the cognitive and perceptual consequences of hypervigilance and 'input dysfunction'.
尽管经过30年的研究,但在我们对精神分裂症输入功能障碍的理解方面仍存在一些惊人的根本性差距。
在对“过度关注”假说的一项初步测试中,精神分裂症患者和对照受试者进行了一项行为测试,该测试改编自最初为表征动物警觉性或持续注意力而开发的范式。在这个计算机化的操作性测试程序中,受试者区分不同显著性的信号和非信号呈现。命中和正确拒绝会带来金钱奖励,而漏报和误报则会导致金钱损失。
来自精神分裂症住院患者以及年龄、教育程度和性别匹配的对照的数据不仅支持了关于精神分裂症在总体信号可检测性方面存在过度关注功能障碍的假说,而且还支持了关于抵抗通常在试验过程中发生的警觉性下降的假说。
就过度警觉和“输入功能障碍”的认知和感知后果而言,讨论了这类损伤的理论重要性。