McLellan T M, Pope J I, Cain J B, Cheung S S
Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, Human Protection and Performance Section, North York, ON, Canada.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;74(6):518-27. doi: 10.1007/BF02376767.
Studies have shown that variations in ambient water vapour pressure from 1.7 to 3.7 kPa have little effect on heat tolerance time at a metabolic rate above 450 W while wearing protective clothing. With lighter exercise, where tolerance times exceed 60 min, variations in vapour pressure have a significant impact on evaporative heat loss and, therefore, heat tolerance. The present study has examined whether these findings extend to conditions with more extreme variations in vapour pressure. Twelve males performed light (L, 350 W) and heavy (H, 500 W) exercise at 40 degrees C in a dry (D, 1.1 kPa) and humid (H, 4.8 kPa) environment while wearing a semi-permeable nuclear, biological and chemical protective clothing ensemble (0.29 m2 x degree C-1.W-1 or 1.88 clo; Woodcock vapour permeability coefficient, im = 0.33). Partitional calorimetry was used to determine the rate of heat storage (S) with evaporative heat loss from the skin (Esk) calculated from changes in dressed mass or the physical properties of the clothing and the vapour pressure gradient between the skin and the environment. Skin vapour pressure was predicted from measurements of water vapour pressure above the skin surface and in the clothing with humidity sensors coupled with thermistors. Final mean skin temperature (Tsk) was higher for the humid trials and averaged 37.4 (0.3) degree C, 38.9 (0.4) degree C, 37.6 (0.5) degree C and 38.5 (0.4) degree C for LD, LH, HD and HH, respectively. Final rectal temperature (Tre) was higher for D with respective values for LD, LH, HD and HH of 39.0 (0.4) degree C, 38.7 (0.4) degree C, 38.8 (0.4) degree C and 38.5 (0.4) degree C. Tolerance time was significantly different among the trials and averaged 120.3 (19.3) min, 54.8 (7.3) min, 63.5 (6.9) min and 36.8 (3.1) min for LD, LH, HD and HH, respectively. Esk was overestimated and, therefore, S was underestimated when the changes in dressed mass were used to determine evaporative heat loss. When skin vapour pressure determined from the humidity sensor data was used to calculate Esk, heat storage was significantly different among the trials and averaged 15.0 (3.0), 13.0 (1.8), 14.2 (2.6) and 12.2 (1.9) kJ.kg-1 for LD, LH, HD and HH, respectively. It was concluded that while wearing the protective clothing all indices of heat strain, including tolerance time, were significantly affected by the change in ambient water vapour pressure from 1.1 to 4.8 kPa during both light and heavy exercise.
研究表明,当代谢率高于450瓦且穿着防护服时,环境水汽压力在1.7至3.7千帕之间变化对耐热时间影响很小。在较轻运动中,耐受时间超过60分钟,水汽压力变化对蒸发散热有显著影响,进而影响耐热性。本研究考察了这些发现是否适用于水汽压力变化更为极端的情况。12名男性在40摄氏度的干燥(D,1.1千帕)和潮湿(H,4.8千帕)环境中进行轻度(L,350瓦)和重度(H,500瓦)运动,同时穿着半透性核生化防护服套装(0.29平方米·摄氏度⁻¹·瓦⁻¹或1.88克罗;伍德科克水汽渗透系数,im = 0.33)。采用分区量热法确定蓄热率(S),通过着装质量变化或服装物理特性以及皮肤与环境之间的水汽压力梯度计算皮肤蒸发散热量(Esk)。皮肤水汽压力通过湿度传感器与热敏电阻测量皮肤表面上方和服装内的水汽压力来预测。潮湿试验的最终平均皮肤温度(Tsk)较高,LD、LH、HD和HH试验的平均皮肤温度分别为37.4(0.3)摄氏度、38.9(0.4)摄氏度、37.6(0.5)摄氏度和38.5(0.4)摄氏度。干燥环境下的最终直肠温度(Tre)较高,LD、LH、HD和HH试验的直肠温度分别为39.0(0.4)摄氏度、38.7(0.4)摄氏度、38.8(0.4)摄氏度和38.5(0.4)摄氏度。各试验的耐受时间差异显著,LD、LH、HD和HH试验的平均耐受时间分别为120.3(19.3)分钟、54.8(7.3)分钟、63.5(6.9)分钟和36.8(3.1)分钟。当用着装质量变化来确定蒸发散热量时,Esk被高估,因此S被低估。当根据湿度传感器数据确定的皮肤水汽压力用于计算Esk时,各试验的蓄热差异显著,LD、LH、HD和HH试验的蓄热平均分别为15.0(3.0)、13.0(1.8)、14.2(2.6)和12.2(1.9)千焦·千克⁻¹。研究得出结论,在穿着防护服时,无论是轻度还是重度运动,环境水汽压力从1.1千帕变化到4.8千帕,所有热应激指标,包括耐受时间,都会受到显著影响。