• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大鼠对甲醛、丙烯醛和乙醛混合物的感觉刺激。

Sensory irritation to mixtures of formaldehyde, acrolein, and acetaldehyde in rats.

作者信息

Cassee F R, Arts J H, Groten J P, Feron V J

机构信息

Toxicology Division, TNO Nutrition and Food Research Institute, Zeist, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 1996;70(6):329-37. doi: 10.1007/s002040050282.

DOI:10.1007/s002040050282
PMID:8975631
Abstract

Sensory irritation of formaldehyde (FRM), acrolein (ACR) and acetaldehyde (ACE) as measured by the decrease in breathing frequency (DBF) was studied in male Wistar rats using nose-only exposure. Groups of four rats were exposed to each of the single compounds separately or to mixtures of FRM, ACR and/or ACE. Exposure concentrations of the mixtures were chosen in such a way that summation of the effects of each chemical would be expected not to exceed 80% reduction of the breathing frequency. FRM, ACR and ACE appeared to act as sensory irritants as defined by Alarie (1966, 1973). With FRM and ACR desensitization occurred, whereas with ACE the breathing frequency gradually decreased with increasing exposure time (up to 30 min). For mixtures, the observed DBF was more pronounced than the DBF for each compound separately, but was less than the sum of the DBFs for the single compounds. A model for three compounds competing for the same receptor was applied to predict the DBF of mixtures of FRM, ACE and ACR. The results also showed that with mixtures no desensitization occurred; in fact, the breathing frequency further decreased in the last 15 min of exposure. These observations were similar to those found for ACE alone, and might have been caused by effects on the upper respiratory tract. The results of the present study allow the conclusion that sensory irritation in rats exposed to mixtures of irritant aldehydes is more pronounced than that caused by each of the aldehydes separately, and that the DBF as a result of exposure to a mixture could well be predicted using a model for competitive agonism, thus providing evidence that the combined effect of these aldehydes is basically a result of competition for a common receptor (trigeminal nerve).

摘要

采用仅经鼻暴露的方式,在雄性Wistar大鼠中研究了通过呼吸频率降低(DBF)来衡量的甲醛(FRM)、丙烯醛(ACR)和乙醛(ACE)的感觉刺激作用。将四只大鼠分为一组,分别暴露于每种单一化合物或FRM、ACR和/或ACE的混合物中。混合物的暴露浓度选择为使得每种化学物质的效应总和预计不会超过呼吸频率降低80%。FRM、ACR和ACE似乎如Alarie(1966年、1973年)所定义的那样起感觉刺激物的作用。对于FRM和ACR发生了脱敏现象,而对于ACE,呼吸频率随着暴露时间增加(长达30分钟)而逐渐降低。对于混合物,观察到的DBF比每种单一化合物的DBF更明显,但小于单一化合物DBF的总和。应用一种三种化合物竞争同一受体的模型来预测FRM、ACE和ACR混合物的DBF。结果还表明,对于混合物没有发生脱敏现象;实际上,在暴露的最后15分钟呼吸频率进一步降低。这些观察结果与单独观察到的ACE的结果相似,可能是由对上呼吸道的影响引起的。本研究结果可以得出结论,暴露于刺激性醛混合物的大鼠中的感觉刺激比每种醛单独引起的更明显,并且使用竞争性激动模型可以很好地预测暴露于混合物导致的DBF,从而提供证据表明这些醛的联合作用基本上是竞争共同受体(三叉神经)的结果。

相似文献

1
Sensory irritation to mixtures of formaldehyde, acrolein, and acetaldehyde in rats.大鼠对甲醛、丙烯醛和乙醛混合物的感觉刺激。
Arch Toxicol. 1996;70(6):329-37. doi: 10.1007/s002040050282.
2
Changes in the nasal epithelium of rats exposed by inhalation to mixtures of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein.通过吸入甲醛、乙醛和丙烯醛混合物暴露的大鼠鼻上皮的变化。
Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1996 Feb;29(2):208-18. doi: 10.1006/faat.1996.0024.
3
Evaluation of sensory irritation from acrolein-formaldehyde mixtures.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1978 Apr;39(4):270-4. doi: 10.1080/0002889778507758.
4
[Protective action of some compounds against the toxicity of acetaldehyde, acrolein and formaldehyde in the rat].[某些化合物对大鼠体内乙醛、丙烯醛和甲醛毒性的保护作用]
Boll Chim Farm. 1991 Nov;130(10):399-401.
5
Sensory irritation response to inhaled aldehydes after formaldehyde pretreatment.甲醛预处理后对吸入醛类的感觉刺激反应。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1985 Jun 15;79(1):143-9. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(85)90376-x.
6
Subchronic inhalation of mixtures of cigarette smoke constituents in Xpa-/-p53+/- knock-out mice: a comparison of intermittent with semi-continuous exposure to acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, and acrolein.Xpa-/-p53+/-基因敲除小鼠亚慢性吸入香烟烟雾成分混合物:间歇性与半连续性暴露于乙醛、甲醛和丙烯醛的比较
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Feb;46(2):527-36. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.08.043. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
7
Sensory irritation response in rats II: recovery and dose-dependence.大鼠的感觉刺激性反应 II:恢复和剂量依赖性。
Bull Math Biol. 2012 Jul;74(7):1673-90. doi: 10.1007/s11538-012-9730-4. Epub 2012 May 5.
8
Sensory irritation to formaldehyde and acrolein during single and repeated exposures in mice.小鼠单次及重复接触甲醛和丙烯醛期间的感觉刺激
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1977 Oct;38(10):509-22. doi: 10.1080/0002889778507665.
9
Sensory irritation and pulmonary irritation by airborne allyl acetate, allyl alcohol, and allyl ether compared to acrolein.与丙烯醛相比,空气中的乙酸烯丙酯、烯丙醇和烯丙基醚引起的感觉刺激和肺部刺激。
Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1984 Apr;54(4):292-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1984.tb01933.x.
10
Combined cytotoxicity of co-exposure to aldehyde mixtures on human bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells.混合醛对人支气管上皮 BEAS-2B 细胞的联合细胞毒性。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Jul;250:650-661. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.118. Epub 2019 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Laboratory Quantification of Emissions from Wildland-Urban Interface Fuels Using Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy.利用傅里叶变换红外光谱法对城乡交错带燃料排放进行实验室量化
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Jul 1;59(25):12843-12852. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c03514. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
2
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 May;68(5):567-579. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04040-6.
3
A Comprehensive Literature Review on the Effects of Formaldehyde on the Upper Respiratory Tract.
关于甲醛对上呼吸道影响的综合文献综述
Cureus. 2024 May 6;16(5):e59743. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59743. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Repeated exposure to eucalyptus wood smoke alters pulmonary gene and metabolic profiles in male Long-Evans rats.反复暴露于桉树木材烟雾会改变雄性长耳大仓鼠的肺部基因和代谢谱。
Toxicol Sci. 2024 May 28;199(2):332-348. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae040.
5
Contributions of particulate and gas phases of simulated burn pit smoke exposures to impairment of respiratory function.模拟燃烧坑烟雾暴露的颗粒物和气态物对呼吸功能损害的贡献。
Inhal Toxicol. 2023 May-Jun;35(5-6):129-138. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2023.2169416. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
6
Reviewing the oral carcinogenic potential of E-cigarettes using the Bradford Hill criteria of causation.运用布拉德福德·希尔因果关系标准评估电子烟的口腔致癌潜力。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Apr;9(4):3142-3152. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.01.23.
7
Safety Assessment of Electronic Cigarettes and Their Relationship with Cardiovascular Disease.电子烟的安全性评估及其与心血管疾病的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 5;15(1):75. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010075.
8
Aldehydes in Relation to Air Pollution Sources: A Case Study around the Beijing Olympics.与空气污染来源相关的醛类:以北京奥运会周边地区为例的研究
Atmos Environ (1994). 2015 May 1;109:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.056.
9
Impacts of a nanosized ceria additive on diesel engine emissions of particulate and gaseous pollutants.纳米氧化铈添加剂对柴油机颗粒和气体污染物排放的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Nov 19;47(22):13077-85. doi: 10.1021/es402140u. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
10
Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes.电子香烟烟雾中的某些致癌物质和有毒物质的含量。
Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23(2):133-9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859. Epub 2013 Mar 6.