Carpentieri S, Morgan S B
Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Tennessee 38152, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1996 Dec;26(6):611-20. doi: 10.1007/BF02172350.
This study examined the relationship between adaptive functioning on the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale (VABS) and intellectual functioning on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, 4th edition (SB-IV) in autistic children and nonautistic retarded children of comparable CA and SB-IV composite score (IQ). The autistic group had lower scores than the retarded group in VABS adaptive composite, Socialization domain, and Communication domain, and SB-IV Verbal Reasoning area. VABS domain scores yielded higher classification rates than the SB-IV area scores in discriminating the two groups. Correlations between the two measures were much higher for the autistic group than for the retarded group. Results support the conclusion that the cognitive impairment in autism is reflected in greater impairment in adaptive behaviors than in mental retardation without autism.
本研究考察了自闭症儿童与年龄和斯坦福-比奈智力量表第四版(SB-IV)综合得分(智商)相当的非自闭症智障儿童在温兰德适应行为量表(VABS)上的适应功能与在斯坦福-比奈智力量表上的智力功能之间的关系。自闭症组在VABS适应综合得分、社会化领域和沟通领域以及SB-IV言语推理方面的得分低于智障组。在区分这两组时,VABS领域得分比SB-IV领域得分产生更高的分类率。自闭症组中这两种测量方法之间的相关性比智障组高得多。结果支持这样的结论,即自闭症中的认知障碍比无自闭症的智力迟钝在适应行为方面有更大的损伤。