Riebe D, Maresh C M, Armstrong L E, Kenefick R W, Castellani J W, Echegaray M E, Clark B A, Camaione D N
Department of Sport, Leisure and Exercise Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269-1110, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997 Jan;29(1):117-24. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199701000-00017.
The purpose of this investigation was to compare the effects of oral and intravenous saline rehydration on differentiated ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and thirst. Eight men underwent three randomly assigned rehydration treatments following a 2- to 4-h exercise-induced dehydration bout to reduce body weight by 4%. Treatments included 0.45% saline infusion (i.v.), 0.45% saline oral ingestion (ORAL), and no fluid (NF). Following rehydration and rest (2 h total), subjects walked at 50% VO2max for 90 min at 36 degrees C (EX). Central RPE during ORAL was lower (P < 0.05) than i.v. and NF throughout EX. Local RPE during NF was higher (P < 0.05) than i.v. and ORAL at minutes 20 and 40 of EX and overall RPE during NF was higher (P < 0.05) than ORAL at minutes 20 and 40 of EX. Significant correlations were found between overall RPE and mean skin temperature for i.v. (r = 0.72) and NF (r = 0.75), and between overall RPE and thirst ratings for i.v. (r = 0.70). Thirst ratings were not different among trials at postdehydration. Following rehydration, thirst was higher (P < 0.05) during NF than i.v. and ORAL and lower (P < 0.05) during ORAL than i.v. at all subsequent time points. Results suggest that oral rehydration is likely to elicit lower RPE and thirst ratings compared with intravenous rehydration.
本研究的目的是比较口服和静脉输注生理盐水对主观用力程度分级(RPE)和口渴感的影响。八名男性在进行2至4小时的运动诱导脱水,使体重减轻4%后,接受了三种随机分配的补液治疗。治疗包括输注0.45%生理盐水(静脉注射)、口服0.45%生理盐水(口服)和不补液(无补液)。补液和休息(共2小时)后,受试者在36摄氏度下以50%的最大摄氧量步行90分钟(运动)。在整个运动过程中,口服组的中枢RPE低于静脉注射组和无补液组(P<0.05)。在运动的第20分钟和第40分钟,无补液组的局部RPE高于静脉注射组和口服组(P<0.05),且在运动的第20分钟和第40分钟,无补液组的总体RPE高于口服组(P<0.05)。静脉注射组(r = 0.72)和无补液组(r = 0.75)的总体RPE与平均皮肤温度之间,以及静脉注射组的总体RPE与口渴评分之间(r = 0.70)存在显著相关性。脱水后各试验间的口渴评分无差异。补液后,在所有后续时间点,无补液组的口渴感高于静脉注射组和口服组(P<0.05),而口服组的口渴感低于静脉注射组(P<0.05)。结果表明,与静脉补液相比,口服补液可能会引起更低的RPE和口渴评分。