Stone J, Wiegand A W, Cooper J, Aronson E
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, New Jersey 08544, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jan;72(1):54-65. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.54.
Two experiments investigated how the dissonance that follows a hypocritical behavior is reduced when 2 alternatives are available; a direct strategy (changing behavior to make it less hypocritical) or an indirect strategy (the affirmation of an unrelated positive aspect of the self). In Experiment 1, after dissonance was aroused by hypocrisy, significantly more participants chose to reduce dissonance directly, despite the clear availability of a self-affirmation strategy. In Experiment 2, participants again chose direct resolution of their hypocritical discrepancy, even when the opportunity to affirm the self held more importance for their global self-worth. The discussion focuses on the mechanisms that influence how people select among readily available strategies for dissonance reduction.
两项实验研究了在有两种选择时,虚伪行为之后产生的认知失调是如何减少的;一种是直接策略(改变行为以使其不那么虚伪),另一种是间接策略(肯定自我的一个不相关的积极方面)。在实验1中,虚伪引发认知失调后,尽管自我肯定策略明显可行,但仍有显著更多的参与者选择直接减少认知失调。在实验2中,参与者再次选择直接解决他们的虚伪差异,即使肯定自我的机会对他们的整体自我价值更为重要。讨论聚焦于影响人们在现有的减少认知失调策略中进行选择的机制。