Suppr超能文献

当举例论证失败时:虚伪与自我完整性的动机。

When exemplification fails: hypocrisy and the motive for self-integrity.

作者信息

Stone J, Wiegand A W, Cooper J, Aronson E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, New Jersey 08544, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jan;72(1):54-65. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.54.

Abstract

Two experiments investigated how the dissonance that follows a hypocritical behavior is reduced when 2 alternatives are available; a direct strategy (changing behavior to make it less hypocritical) or an indirect strategy (the affirmation of an unrelated positive aspect of the self). In Experiment 1, after dissonance was aroused by hypocrisy, significantly more participants chose to reduce dissonance directly, despite the clear availability of a self-affirmation strategy. In Experiment 2, participants again chose direct resolution of their hypocritical discrepancy, even when the opportunity to affirm the self held more importance for their global self-worth. The discussion focuses on the mechanisms that influence how people select among readily available strategies for dissonance reduction.

摘要

两项实验研究了在有两种选择时,虚伪行为之后产生的认知失调是如何减少的;一种是直接策略(改变行为以使其不那么虚伪),另一种是间接策略(肯定自我的一个不相关的积极方面)。在实验1中,虚伪引发认知失调后,尽管自我肯定策略明显可行,但仍有显著更多的参与者选择直接减少认知失调。在实验2中,参与者再次选择直接解决他们的虚伪差异,即使肯定自我的机会对他们的整体自我价值更为重要。讨论聚焦于影响人们在现有的减少认知失调策略中进行选择的机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验