McKeefry D J, Watson J D, Frackowiak R S, Fong K, Zeki S
Wellcome Laboratory, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, United Kingdom.
Neuroimage. 1997 Jan;5(1):1-12. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0246.
We have used the technique of positron emission tomography to study and compare the cortical activity produced when humans view a pattern of small squares moving incoherently with respect to one another and when the same pattern moves coherently and unidirectionally. A stationary version of the stimulus acted as a control. Our choice of paradigm was inspired by psychophysical models and physiological studies in the macaque monkey which show that directionally selective cells in V5 respond optimally to unidirectional coherent motion, whereas those of V1 respond to motion within their receptive fields, regardless of the motion in surrounding parts. Our results show that human V1/V2, V3, and V5 are all activated by both types of motion stimuli. Incoherent motion, however, proved to be more effective than coherent motion in activating V1/V2 and V5. Thus the higher perceptual salience of unidirectional coherent motion in comparison to incoherent motion is not reflected by any increased activation of human area V5.
我们运用正电子发射断层扫描技术,对人类观看彼此无规则移动的小方块图案时以及观看相同图案做连贯单向移动时所产生的皮层活动进行了研究和比较。刺激物的静止版本用作对照。我们对实验范式的选择受到猕猴心理物理学模型和生理学研究的启发,这些研究表明,V5区的方向选择性细胞对单向连贯运动反应最佳,而V1区的细胞则对其感受野内的运动做出反应,无论周围部分的运动情况如何。我们的研究结果表明,人类的V1/V2、V3和V5区在两种运动刺激下均被激活。然而,事实证明,无规则运动在激活V1/V2和V5区方面比连贯运动更有效。因此,与无规则运动相比,单向连贯运动在感知上的更高显著性并未通过人类V5区激活的增加而体现出来。