Davidson K, Hall P
Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 35487-0348, USA.
J Behav Med. 1997 Feb;20(1):47-54. doi: 10.1023/a:1025587113192.
We investigated if Type A Structured Interview (SI)-assessed hostility (PoHo) is subject to voluntary underreporting, or faking-good, by hostile subjects. Sixteen men who previously scored above the clinical cutoff of 3 on SI hostility were randomly assigned to an experimental (N = 8) or control (N = 8) group. Both groups underwent a second videotaped SI, prior to which experimental subjects were asked to present themselves in a favorable light. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that experimental subjects were able successfully to decrease their global PoHo scores when instructed to do so (38% scored below the clinical cutoff score). The SI-derived hostility score is vulnerable to faking-good, and attention should be paid to both the motivational set of subjects and the instructions given prior to the SI.
我们研究了A型结构化访谈（SI）评估的敌意（PoHo）是否会被敌意受试者自愿少报或伪装良好。16名先前在SI敌意量表上得分高于临床临界值3分的男性被随机分为实验组（N = 8）或对照组（N = 8）。两组都接受了第二次录像的SI，在此之前，要求实验组受试者以积极的形象展现自己。重复测量方差分析显示，当得到指示时，实验组受试者能够成功降低他们的总体PoHo分数（38%的受试者得分低于临床临界分数）。SI得出的敌意分数容易受到伪装良好的影响，应同时关注受试者的动机背景以及SI之前给出的指示。
