Suppr超能文献

用于诊断肺炎衣原体感染的Medac衣原体免疫球蛋白M(IgM)、免疫球蛋白G(IgG)和免疫球蛋白A(IgA)重组酶联免疫吸附测定(rELISA)的评估

Evaluation of Chlamydia immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG, and IgA rELISAs Medac for diagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae infection.

作者信息

Kutlin A, Tsumura N, Emre U, Roblin P M, Hammerschlag M R

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, State University of New York at Brooklyn 11203-2098, USA.

出版信息

Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1997 Mar;4(2):213-6. doi: 10.1128/cdli.4.2.213-216.1997.

Abstract

Chlamydia pneumoniae is an important pathogen responsible for a variety of respiratory diseases in humans. Cell culture remains the most specific method for C. pneumoniae diagnosis, but it is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Thus, serology, particularly microimmunofluorescence (MIF) testing, is frequently utilized. However, the MIF test has a significant subjective component. We evaluated a new serological test: Chlamydia Immunoglobulin M (IgG, IgA, and IgM rELISAs Medac, based on a recombinant Chlamydia-specific lipopolysaccharide (LPS) fragment, for the diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection. The results of this study demonstrated that the use of rELISAs Medac with single sera does not appear to be sensitive or specific for diagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection compared to culture. In children, sensitivities of the rELISAs compared to culture did not exceed 34.2%, and the specificities ranged from 68.4% (IgG) to 91.2% (IgA). In adults, the sensitivities of the rELISAs were slightly higher, up to 77.8% (IgA or IgG), but the specificities ranged from a very low 20.8% for IgA or IgG to 81.1% for IgM. When multiple sera were tested, the results of the rELISAs Medac correlated with culture results in five of eight (62.5%) patients. However, this offers only a retrospective diagnosis, which makes it difficult to manage these patients prospectively.

摘要

肺炎衣原体是导致人类多种呼吸道疾病的重要病原体。细胞培养仍然是诊断肺炎衣原体最具特异性的方法,但它 labor-intensive 且耗时。因此,血清学检测,尤其是微量免疫荧光(MIF)检测,被频繁使用。然而,MIF检测有很大的主观因素。我们评估了一种新的血清学检测方法:基于重组衣原体特异性脂多糖(LPS)片段的衣原体免疫球蛋白M(IgG、IgA和IgM rELISAs Medac),用于诊断肺炎衣原体感染。本研究结果表明,与培养法相比,使用单份血清的rELISAs Medac对肺炎衣原体感染的诊断似乎不敏感或不具特异性。在儿童中,与培养法相比,rELISAs的敏感性不超过34.2%,特异性范围为68.4%(IgG)至91.2%(IgA)。在成人中,rELISAs的敏感性略高,高达77.8%(IgA或IgG),但特异性范围从IgA或IgG的极低的20.8%到IgM的81.1%。当检测多份血清时,rELISAs Medac的结果与8例患者中的5例(62.5%)的培养结果相关。然而,这仅提供回顾性诊断,这使得前瞻性管理这些患者变得困难。 (注:原文中“labor-intensive”未翻译完整,可补充为“劳动强度大的”)

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验