• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较EF-18琼脂、改良亮绿琼脂与鲁滕西特用于从家禽样本中分离沙门氏菌的效果。

A comparison of EF-18 agar and modified brilliant green agar with lutensit for isolation of Salmonella from poultry samples.

作者信息

Petersen L

机构信息

Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Diagnostic Bacteriology Section, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Vet Scand. 1997;38(1):79-85. doi: 10.1186/BF03548510.

DOI:10.1186/BF03548510
PMID:9129349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8057049/
Abstract

Two selective plating media were compared to determine their performance in a three-step protocol for isolation of Salmonella from faecal, litter, and fluff samples. The enrichment protocol consisted of: 1) Preenrichment in buffered peptone water (BPW), 2) Selective enrichment in Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth, and 3) Plating onto EF-18 agar and BGA/L simultaneously. From a total of 1101 samples, Salmonella was isolated from 158, 157 of which were faecal samples. Thirty-one of these isolates were recovered on one medium only, 18 could not be found on BGA/L and 13 could not be found on EF-18 agar. The relative specificity and sensitivity of each plating agar was determined by enumeration of false-positive and false-negative reactions. EF-18 agar compared favourably with BGA/L, displaying a sensitivity of 0.92 as opposed to 0.89 for BGA/L, calculated for the "fecal samples" group only. The calculated specificities for each group of samples were likewise considerably higher for EF-18 agar (0.75-0.91) than for BGA/L (0.35-0.55). Though EF-18 agar is slightly more expensive than BGA/L, the routine use of the former may result in a considerable reduction in overall laboratory costs due to its superior selectivity. On the other hand the combination of the 2 media clearly would reduce the number of false negative results, with little extra cost.

摘要

比较了两种选择性平板培养基,以确定它们在从粪便、垫料和绒毛样品中分离沙门氏菌的三步方案中的性能。富集方案包括:1)在缓冲蛋白胨水(BPW)中进行预富集,2)在Rappaport-Vassiliadis肉汤中进行选择性富集,3)同时接种到EF-18琼脂和BGA/L上。在总共1101个样品中,分离出158株沙门氏菌,其中157株为粪便样品。这些分离株中有31株仅在一种培养基上被检出,18株在BGA/L上未检出,13株在EF-18琼脂上未检出。通过计数假阳性和假阴性反应来确定每种平板琼脂的相对特异性和敏感性。与BGA/L相比,EF-18琼脂表现良好,仅针对“粪便样品”组计算,其敏感性为0.92,而BGA/L为0.89。同样,EF-18琼脂每组样品的计算特异性(0.75 - 0.91)也明显高于BGA/L(0.35 - 0.55)。虽然EF-18琼脂比BGA/L略贵,但由于其优越的选择性,常规使用前者可能会导致实验室总成本大幅降低。另一方面,两种培养基联合使用显然会减少假阴性结果的数量,且成本增加很少。

相似文献

1
A comparison of EF-18 agar and modified brilliant green agar with lutensit for isolation of Salmonella from poultry samples.比较EF-18琼脂、改良亮绿琼脂与鲁滕西特用于从家禽样本中分离沙门氏菌的效果。
Acta Vet Scand. 1997;38(1):79-85. doi: 10.1186/BF03548510.
2
A comparison of two methods for isolation of Salmonella from poultry litter samples.两种从家禽粪便样本中分离沙门氏菌方法的比较。
Poult Sci. 1994 Oct;73(10):1617-21. doi: 10.3382/ps.0731617.
3
Comparative studies of diagnostic bacteriological methods for the recovery of Salmonella from faecal samples from flocks of layers.从蛋鸡群粪便样本中分离沙门氏菌的诊断细菌学方法的比较研究
Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1998 May;45(4):245-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1998.tb00789.x.
4
Evaluation of methods for isolation of Salmonella species using modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium and Salmonella-Shigella agar.使用改良半固体Rappaport-Vassiliadis培养基和沙门氏菌-志贺氏菌琼脂分离沙门氏菌属方法的评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Nov;17(11):791-3. doi: 10.1007/s100960050188.
5
The isolation of salmonellae from poultry environmental samples by several enrichment procedures using plating media with and without novobiocin.通过使用含和不含新生霉素的平板培养基的几种富集程序,从家禽环境样本中分离沙门氏菌。
Poult Sci. 1990 May;69(5):721-6. doi: 10.3382/ps.0690721.
6
Performance of six culture media for isolation of Salmonella species from stool samples.六种用于从粪便样本中分离沙门氏菌的培养基的性能
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Dec;15(12):922-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01690509.
7
Multiple plating from enrichment media as an aid to salmonella isolation.采用增菌培养基多次接种培养以辅助沙门氏菌分离。
J Hyg (Lond). 1983 Jun;90(3):435-40. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400029077.
8
Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance profile and comparison of methods for the isolation of salmonella in chicken liver from Argentina.阿根廷鸡肝中沙门氏菌的流行情况、耐药谱分析及分离方法比较。
Food Res Int. 2019 May;119:541-546. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
9
Importance of pre-enrichment media for isolation of Salmonella spp. from swine and poultry.预增菌培养基对从猪和家禽中分离沙门氏菌属的重要性。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998 Dec 1;169(1):125-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13308.x.
10
Sensitivity and specificity of different methods for the isolation of Salmonella from pigs.从猪身上分离沙门氏菌的不同方法的敏感性和特异性。
Acta Vet Scand. 1991;32(4):473-81. doi: 10.1186/BF03546947.

本文引用的文献

1
The comparison of percentages in matched samples.匹配样本中百分比的比较。
Biometrika. 1950 Dec;37(3-4):256-66.
2
Evaluation of motility enrichment on modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium (MSRV) and automated conductance in combination with Rambach agar for Salmonella detection in environmental samples of a milk powder factory.评估改良半固体Rappaport-Vassiliadis培养基(MSRV)上的运动性富集以及结合Rambach琼脂的自动电导率用于奶粉厂环境样品中沙门氏菌的检测。
Int J Food Microbiol. 1994 May;22(2-3):201-6. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90142-2.
3
A comparison of six different plating media used in the isolation of Salmonella.用于分离沙门氏菌的六种不同平板培养基的比较。
Int J Food Microbiol. 1994 Jun;22(4):277-89. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90179-1.
4
Relative effectiveness of selective plating agars for recovery of Salmonella species from selected high-moisture foods.用于从特定高水分食品中分离沙门氏菌的选择性平板琼脂的相对有效性。
J AOAC Int. 1995 May-Jun;78(3):679-90.
5
Improved hydrophobic grid membrane filter method, using EF-18 agar, for detection of Salmonella in foods: collaborative study.使用EF-18琼脂改良疏水网格膜过滤法检测食品中的沙门氏菌:协作研究
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1990 Sep-Oct;73(5):734-42.
6
Sensitivity and specificity of different methods for the isolation of Salmonella from pigs.从猪身上分离沙门氏菌的不同方法的敏感性和特异性。
Acta Vet Scand. 1991;32(4):473-81. doi: 10.1186/BF03546947.