Fitoussi F, Cohen R, Brami G, Doit C, Brahimi N, de la Rocque F, Bingen E
Service de Microbiologie, Hpital Robert Debré, Paris, France.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 Mar;16(3):233-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01709587.
In the evaluation of treatment failure in group A streptococcal pharyngitis, it is essential to distinguish persistence or relapse with homologous streptococcal strains from the acquisition of new, unrelated strains. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of total DNA were used as epidemiological tools to compare 122 pre- and post-treatment Streptococcus pyogenes isolates obtained from 61 patients. The results obtained by molecular typing showed that bacteriological failures were due to the original strains in 43 cases (70%) and to new strains in 18 cases (30%). In the present study, restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of total DNA appeared to be more discriminative than randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Thus, molecular analysis of DNA is an effective way to distinguish recurrence from persistence or relapse and will be useful in assessing the efficacy of new antibiotic treatments.
在评估A组链球菌性咽炎的治疗失败情况时,区分同源链球菌菌株的持续感染或复发与新的无关菌株的获得至关重要。随机扩增多态性DNA分析和总DNA的限制性片段长度多态性分析被用作流行病学工具,以比较从61例患者中获得的122株治疗前后的化脓性链球菌分离株。分子分型获得的结果表明,43例(70%)细菌学失败是由原始菌株引起的,18例(30%)是由新菌株引起的。在本研究中,总DNA的限制性片段长度多态性分析似乎比随机扩增多态性DNA分析更具鉴别力。因此,DNA分子分析是区分复发与持续感染或复发的有效方法,将有助于评估新抗生素治疗的疗效。