Penland R L, Wilhelmus K R
Sid W. Richardson Ocular Microbiology Laboratory, Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Apr;35(4):915-22. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.4.915-922.1997.
Acanthamoeba is a genus of ubiquitous, free-living amebae that can be difficult to isolate by standard microbiologic techniques. We retrospectively reviewed the laboratory records of patients with ocular acanthamoebic infection for the period from January 1973 to June 1996 and found that Acanthamoeba isolates were recovered from 73, 71, and 70% of clinical specimens inoculated onto buffered charcoal-yeast extract agar (BCYE), nonnutrient agar with live or dead Escherichia coli, and tryptic soy agar (TSA) with horse or sheep blood, respectively. We then prospectively compared the recovery of a corneal isolate of Acanthamoeba on commercial media from Remel and BBL (TSA with 5% sheep blood, TSA with 5% horse blood, TSA with 5% rabbit blood, V agar, chocolate agar, BCYE, and selective BCYE with polymyxin B, anisomycin, and vancomycin) and on axenic and monoxenic media prepared with live or dead bacteria (Enterobacter aerogenes, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia). Good recovery of trophozoites was obtained on BCYE, TSA with rabbit blood, TSA with horse blood, and Remel TSA with sheep blood. BBL TSA with horse blood or rabbit blood provided good recovery of cysts. All species of live or dead bacteria yielded good recovery of trophozoites; however, only nonnutrient agar with live P. aeruginosa, live E. aerogenes, or live S. maltophilia gave good recovery of cysts. TSA with either rabbit blood or horse blood, BCYE, and nonnutrient agar prepared with live P. aeruginosa, E. aerogenes, or S. maltophilia offer optimal recovery of Acanthamoeba.
棘阿米巴属是一类普遍存在的自由生活阿米巴,采用标准微生物学技术很难将其分离出来。我们回顾性分析了1973年1月至1996年6月期间眼部棘阿米巴感染患者的实验室记录,发现分别从接种于缓冲炭酵母提取物琼脂(BCYE)、含活的或死的大肠杆菌的无营养琼脂以及含马血或羊血的胰蛋白胨大豆琼脂(TSA)的临床标本中分离出棘阿米巴的比例为73%、71%和70%。然后,我们前瞻性比较了从Remel和BBL公司购买的商业培养基(含5%羊血的TSA、含5%马血的TSA、含5%兔血的TSA、V琼脂、巧克力琼脂、BCYE以及含多粘菌素B、茴香霉素和万古霉素的选择性BCYE)以及用活的或死的细菌(产气肠杆菌、大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌、粘质沙雷菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌)制备的无菌和单菌培养基上棘阿米巴角膜分离株的回收率。在BCYE、含兔血的TSA、含马血的TSA以及含羊血的Remel TSA上滋养体回收率良好。含马血或兔血的BBL TSA对包囊的回收率良好。所有活的或死的细菌种类对滋养体的回收率都很高;然而,只有含活的铜绿假单胞菌、活的产气肠杆菌或活的嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌的无营养琼脂对包囊的回收率良好。含兔血或马血的TSA、BCYE以及用活的铜绿假单胞菌、产气肠杆菌或嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌制备的无营养琼脂对棘阿米巴的回收率最佳。