Cooper C E, Springett R
Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997 Jun 29;352(1354):669-76. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0048.
Cytochrome oxidase is the terminal electron acceptor of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. It is responsible for the vast majority of oxygen consumption in the body and essential for the efficient generation of cellular ATP. The enzyme contains four redox active metal centres; one of these, the binuclear CuA centre, has a strong absorbance in the near-infrared that enables it to be detectable in vivo by near-infrared spectroscopy. However, the fact that the concentration of this centre is less than 10% of that of haemoglobin means that its detection is not a trivial matter. Unlike the case with deoxyhaemoglobin and oxyhaemoglobin, concentration changes of the total cytochrome oxidase protein occur very slowly (over days) and are therefore not easily detectable by near-infrared spectroscopy. However, the copper centre rapidly accepts and donates an electron, and can thus change its redox state quickly; this redox change is detectable by near-infrared spectroscopy. Many factors can affect the CuA redox state in vivo (Cooper et al. 1994), but most significant is likely to be the molecular oxygen concentration (at low oxygen tensions, electrons build up on CuA as reduction of oxygen by the enzyme starts to limit the steady-state rate of electron transfer). The factors underlying haemoglobin oxygenation, deoxygenation and blood volume changes are, in general, well understood by the clinicians and physiologists who perform near-infrared spectroscopy measurements. In contrast, the factors that control the steady-state redox level of CuA in cytochrome oxidase are still a matter of active debate, even amongst biochemists studying the isolated enzyme and mitochondria. Coupled with the difficulties of accurate in vivo measurements it is perhaps not surprising that the field of cytochrome oxidase near-infrared spectroscopy has a somewhat chequered past. Too often papers have been written with insufficient information to enable the measurements to be repeated and few attempts have been made to test the algorithms in vivo. In recent years a number of research groups and commercial spectrometer manufacturers have made a concerted attempt to not only say how they are attempting to measure cytochrome oxidase by near-infrared spectroscopy but also to demonstrate that they are really doing so. We applaud these attempts, which in general fall into three areas: first, modelling of data can be performed to determine what problems are likely to derail cytochrome oxidase detection algorithms (Matcher et al. 1995); secondly haemoglobin concentration changes can be made by haemodilution (using saline or artificial blood substitutes) in animals (Tamura 1993) or patients (Skov & Greisen 1994); and thirdly, the cytochrome oxidase redox state can be fixed by the use of mitochondrial inhibitors and then attempts make to cause spurious cytochrome changes by dramatically varying haemoglobin oxygenation, haemoglobin concentration and light scattering (Cooper et al. 1997). We have previously written reviews covering the difficulties of measuring the cytochrome near-infrared spectroscopy signal in vivo (Cooper et al. 1997) and the factors affecting the oxidation state of cytochrome oxidase CuA (Cooper et al. 1994). In this article we would like to strike a somewhat more optimistic note--we will stress the usefulness this measurement may have in the clinical environment, as well as describing conditions under which we can have confidence that we are measuring real changes in the CuA redox state.
细胞色素氧化酶是线粒体呼吸链的末端电子受体。它负责身体中绝大部分的氧气消耗,对于细胞高效生成三磷酸腺苷(ATP)至关重要。该酶含有四个具有氧化还原活性的金属中心;其中之一,双核铜A中心,在近红外区域有很强的吸收峰,这使得它能够通过近红外光谱在体内被检测到。然而,这个中心的浓度不到血红蛋白浓度的10%,这一事实意味着对它的检测并非易事。与脱氧血红蛋白和氧合血红蛋白的情况不同,细胞色素氧化酶总蛋白的浓度变化非常缓慢(历时数天),因此很难通过近红外光谱检测到。然而,铜中心能快速接受和传递一个电子,从而能够迅速改变其氧化还原状态;这种氧化还原变化可以通过近红外光谱检测到。许多因素会在体内影响铜A的氧化还原状态(库珀等人,1994年),但最显著的可能是分子氧浓度(在低氧张力下,随着酶对氧的还原开始限制电子传递的稳态速率,电子在铜A上积累)。进行近红外光谱测量的临床医生和生理学家通常对血红蛋白氧合、脱氧和血容量变化的潜在因素有很好的理解。相比之下,即使在研究分离的酶和线粒体的生物化学家当中,控制细胞色素氧化酶中铜A稳态氧化还原水平的因素仍然是一个活跃的争论话题。再加上体内精确测量的困难,细胞色素氧化酶近红外光谱领域有着曲折的过去也许就不足为奇了。太多的论文所提供的信息不足以让测量得以重复,而且很少有人尝试在体内测试这些算法。近年来,一些研究团队和商业光谱仪制造商齐心协力,不仅说明了他们试图如何通过近红外光谱测量细胞色素氧化酶,还证明了他们确实在这样做。我们赞赏这些尝试,这些尝试大致可分为三个方面:第一,可以进行数据建模以确定哪些问题可能会破坏细胞色素氧化酶检测算法(马彻等人,1995年);第二,可以通过在动物(田村,1993年)或患者(斯科夫和格雷森,1994年)中进行血液稀释(使用生理盐水或人造血液替代品)来改变血红蛋白浓度;第三,可以使用线粒体抑制剂固定细胞色素氧化酶的氧化还原状态,然后尝试通过大幅改变血红蛋白氧合、血红蛋白浓度和光散射来引起虚假的细胞色素变化(库珀等人,1997年)。我们之前曾撰写过综述,涵盖了在体内测量细胞色素近红外光谱信号的困难(库珀等人,1997年)以及影响细胞色素氧化酶铜A氧化态的因素(库珀等人,1994年)。在本文中,我们想表达一种更为乐观的观点——我们将强调这种测量在临床环境中可能具有的用途,同时描述在哪些条件下我们能够确信我们正在测量铜A氧化还原状态的真实变化。