Maurin M, Eb F, Etienne J, Raoult D
Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS UPRESA 6020, Université de la Méditerranée, Faculté de Médecine, Marseille, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Sep;35(9):2283-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.9.2283-2287.1997.
Diagnosis of Chlamydia or Bartonella infections continues to rely mainly on serology. However, serological cross-reactions between members of these genera have recently been described. Sera from eight patients originally diagnosed as having Chlamydia pneumoniae endocarditis reacted with both Chlamydia sp. and Bartonella quintana antigens (microimmunofluorescence technique). Adsorption of sera with B. quintana or C. pneumoniae antigens removed anti-C. pneumoniae antibodies, whereas adsorption with C. pneumoniae antigens did not change antibody titers to B. quintana. Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of cross-reacting antigens and showed antibody patterns in all sera to be compatible with a Bartonella infection. These patients were therefore probably suffering from Bartonella-induced rather than Chlamydia-induced endocarditis. In contrast, sera from 10 patients presumed to be suffering from C. pneumoniae pneumonia did not display anti-B. quintana antibodies, although cross-reacting antigens were revealed by Western blotting. This work highlights the possibility that cases of infective Bartonella endocarditis are erroneously diagnosed as chlamydial infections.
衣原体或巴尔通体感染的诊断目前仍主要依赖血清学检测。然而,近来已有报道称这些菌属的成员之间存在血清学交叉反应。最初被诊断为肺炎衣原体心内膜炎的8例患者的血清,与衣原体属和五日热巴尔通体抗原均发生反应(微量免疫荧光技术)。用五日热巴尔通体或肺炎衣原体抗原吸附血清可去除抗肺炎衣原体抗体,而用肺炎衣原体抗原吸附则不会改变针对五日热巴尔通体的抗体滴度。蛋白质印迹分析证实了交叉反应抗原的存在,并显示所有血清中的抗体模式均与巴尔通体感染相符。因此,这些患者可能患的是巴尔通体所致的心内膜炎,而非衣原体所致。相比之下,10例疑似患肺炎衣原体肺炎患者的血清,虽经蛋白质印迹法显示存在交叉反应抗原,但未显示出抗五日热巴尔通体抗体。这项研究凸显了感染性巴尔通体心内膜炎病例被误诊为衣原体感染的可能性。