Bailey D M, Davies B
School of Applied Sciences, University of Glamorgan, United Kingdom.
Br J Sports Med. 1997 Sep;31(3):183-90. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.31.3.183.
Acclimatisation to environmental hypoxia initiates a series of metabolic and musculocardio-respiratory adaptations that influence oxygen transport and utilisation, or better still, being born and raised at altitude, is necessary to achieve optimal physical performance at altitude, scientific evidence to support the potentiating effects after return to sea level is at present equivocal. Despite this, elite athletes continue to spend considerable time and resources training at altitude, misled by subjective coaching opinion and the inconclusive findings of a large number of uncontrolled studies. Scientific investigation has focused on the optimisation of the theoretically beneficial aspects of altitude acclimatisation, which include increases in blood haemoglobin concentration, elevated buffering capacity, and improvements in the structural and biochemical properties of skeletal muscle. However, not all aspects of altitude acclimatisation are beneficial; cardiac output and blood flow to skeletal muscles decrease, and preliminary evidence has shown that hypoxia in itself is responsible for a depression of immune function and increased tissue damage mediated by oxidative stress. Future research needs to focus on these less beneficial aspects of altitude training, the implications of which pose a threat to both the fitness and the health of the elite competitor. Paul Bert was the first investigator to show that acclimatisation to a chronically reduced inspiratory partial pressure of oxygen (P1O2) invoked a series of central and peripheral adaptations that served to maintain adequate tissue oxygenation in healthy skeletal muscle, physiological adaptations that have been subsequently implicated in the improvement in exercise performance during altitude acclimatisation. However, it was not until half a century later that scientists suggested that the additive stimulus of environmental hypoxia could potentially compound the normal physiological adaptations to endurance training and accelerate performance improvements after return to sea level. This has stimulated an exponential increase in scientific research, and, since 1984, 22 major reviews have summarised the physiological implications of altitude training for both aerobic and anaerobic performance at altitude and after return to sea level. Of these reviews, only eight have specifically focused on physical performance changes after return to sea level, the most comprehensive of which was recently written by Wolski et al. Few reviews have considered the potentially less favourable physiological responses to moderate altitude exposure, which include decreases in absolute training intensity, decreased plasma volume, depression of haemopoiesis and increased haemolysis, increases in sympathetically mediated glycogen depletion at altitude, and increased respiratory muscle work after return to sea level. In addition, there is a risk of developing more serious medical complications at altitude, which include acute mountain sickness, pulmonary oedema, cardiac arrhythmias, and cerebral hypoxia. The possible implications of changes in immune function at altitude have also been largely ignored, despite accumulating evidence of hypoxia mediated immunosuppression. In general, altitude training has been shown to improve performance at altitude, whereas no unequivocal evidence exists to support the claim that performance at sea level is improved. Table 1 summarises the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of altitude training for sea level performance. This review summarises the physiological rationale for altitude training as a means of enhancing endurance performance after return to sea level. Factors that have been shown to affect the acclimatisation process and the subsequent implications for exercise performance at sea level will also be discussed. Studies were located using five major database searches, which included Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Sports Discus, and Sport, in
适应环境性低氧会引发一系列代谢和肌肉心肺适应性变化,这些变化会影响氧气的运输和利用。或者更确切地说,在高海拔地区出生和成长对于在高海拔地区实现最佳身体表现是必要的。目前,关于返回海平面后这种增强效应的科学证据尚不明确。尽管如此,受主观教练意见和大量无对照研究的不确定结果误导,精英运动员仍继续花费大量时间和资源在高海拔地区训练。科学研究主要集中在优化高海拔适应在理论上有益的方面,包括血液血红蛋白浓度的增加、缓冲能力的提高以及骨骼肌结构和生化特性的改善。然而,高海拔适应并非所有方面都是有益的;心输出量和流向骨骼肌的血流量会减少,初步证据表明低氧本身会导致免疫功能抑制以及氧化应激介导的组织损伤增加。未来的研究需要关注高海拔训练这些不太有益的方面,其影响对精英运动员的健康和体能都构成威胁。保罗·伯特是首位发现适应长期降低的吸入氧分压(P1O2)会引发一系列中枢和外周适应性变化的研究者,这些变化有助于在健康骨骼肌中维持充足的组织氧合,这些生理适应性变化随后被认为与高海拔适应期间运动表现的改善有关。然而,直到半个世纪后,科学家们才提出环境低氧的附加刺激可能会使正常的耐力训练生理适应性变化叠加,并加速返回海平面后的表现提升。这刺激了科学研究呈指数级增长,自1984年以来,已有22篇主要综述总结了高海拔训练对高海拔及返回海平面后的有氧和无氧表现的生理影响。在这些综述中,只有8篇专门关注了返回海平面后的身体表现变化。其中最全面的一篇是最近由沃尔斯基等人撰写的。很少有综述考虑到对中等海拔暴露可能不太有利的生理反应,包括绝对训练强度降低、血浆量减少、造血抑制和溶血增加、高海拔地区交感神经介导的糖原消耗增加以及返回海平面后呼吸肌工作增加。此外,在高海拔地区有发生更严重医疗并发症的风险,包括急性高山病、肺水肿、心律失常和脑缺氧。尽管有越来越多关于低氧介导的免疫抑制的证据,但高海拔地区免疫功能变化的可能影响在很大程度上也被忽视了。一般来说,高海拔训练已被证明能提高在高海拔地区的表现,而没有明确证据支持在海平面表现会提高的说法。表1总结了高海拔训练对海平面表现的理论优缺点。本综述总结了高海拔训练作为提高返回海平面后耐力表现手段的生理原理。还将讨论已被证明会影响适应过程以及随后对海平面运动表现影响的因素。通过五项主要数据库检索来查找相关研究,这些数据库包括医学文献数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、科学引文索引(Science Citation Index)、体育文献数据库(Sports Discus)和体育(Sport),在……