Suppr超能文献

酒精与药物诊断的疾病分类比较:一项多地点、多工具的国际研究。

Nosological comparisons of alcohol and drug diagnoses: a multisite, multi-instrument international study.

作者信息

Hasin D, Grant B F, Cottler L, Blaine J, Towle L, Ustün B, Sartorius N

机构信息

Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Sep 25;47(3):217-26. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00092-6.

Abstract

International nosological research was conducted to determine cross-system agreement on alcohol and drug dependence and harmful use (abuse). ICD-10, DSM-IV and DSM-III-R diagnoses were compared in 1,811 subjects from a variety of treatment and other types of settings from 12 sites around the world. Three diagnostic instruments were used: the Alcohol Use Disorders and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-Alcohol/Drug-Revised (AUDADIS-ADR), the composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI), and the schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry (SCAN). At seven of the study sites, two or more of these instruments were used. Results for dependence diagnoses showed excellent cross-system agreement across sites and instruments, especially for current diagnoses. Cross-system agreement for harmless use (abuse) was much lower and less consistent. Geographic location or culture appeared to have little influence on the results for either dependence or harmful use.

摘要

开展了国际疾病分类研究,以确定在酒精和药物依赖及有害使用(滥用)方面跨系统的一致性。对来自全球12个地点各种治疗及其他类型机构的1811名受试者的国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)、精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版(DSM - IV)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本(DSM - III - R)诊断结果进行了比较。使用了三种诊断工具:酒精使用障碍及相关残疾访谈表 - 酒精/药物修订版(AUDADIS - ADR)、综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)以及神经精神病学临床评估表(SCAN)。在7个研究地点使用了两种或更多种这些工具。依赖诊断结果显示,跨地点和工具的跨系统一致性极佳,尤其是对于当前诊断。无害使用(滥用)的跨系统一致性则低得多且不太稳定。地理位置或文化似乎对依赖或有害使用的结果影响很小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验