Chatterji S, Saunders J B, Vrasti R, Grant B F, Hasin D, Mager D
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Sep 25;47(3):171-85. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00088-4.
The purpose of the present study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the alcohol and drug modules of the AUDADIS-ADR in three sites: Bangalore, India, Jebel, Romania and Sydney, Australia. The overall reliability of ICD-10, DSM-IV and DSM-III-R dependence diagnoses was found to be good to excellent for each substance, including alcohol, for each time frame, regardless of whether the total sample or user subsample figured into the calculations. Reliability associated with corresponding harmful use and abuse diagnoses were mixed, but generally lower. Reliability statistics for Bangalore were generally lower than those of the Jebel and Sydney sites, particularly for alcohol diagnostic criteria. Implications of these results are discussed, in conjunction with results from the discrepancy interview protocol analyses within sites, in terms of future revisions to the AUDADIS-ADR and its training procedures tailored to developing countries.
本研究的目的是在印度班加罗尔、罗马尼亚杰贝勒和澳大利亚悉尼这三个地点检验AUDADIS - ADR酒精和药物模块的重测信度。结果发现,对于包括酒精在内的每种物质,在每个时间框架内,无论计算中使用的是总样本还是使用者子样本,ICD - 10、DSM - IV和DSM - III - R依赖诊断的总体信度均为良好至优秀。与相应有害使用和滥用诊断相关的信度参差不齐,但总体较低。班加罗尔的信度统计数据普遍低于杰贝勒和悉尼地点,尤其是在酒精诊断标准方面。结合各地点差异访谈协议分析的结果,就AUDADIS - ADR的未来修订及其针对发展中国家的培训程序,讨论了这些结果的意义。