Pull C B, Saunders J B, Mavreas V, Cottler L B, Grant B F, Hasin D S, Blaine J, Mager D, Ustün B T
Centre Hospitalier, Luxembourg Service de Neuropsychiatrie, Luxembourg.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Sep 25;47(3):207-16. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00091-4.
Agreement between the AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN in case identification for ICD-10 alcohol and drug use disorders and diagnostic criteria was investigated in three countries, Luxembourg, Greece and the US. Overall, agreement for ICD-10 dependence diagnoses between the three instruments was fair to good for alcohol, opioids and cocaine, but generally lower for dependence diagnoses for other substance. In contrast, concordance between instruments for harmful use diagnoses was extremely poor for all substances. Implications of these major findings are discussed in terms of the relationship between prevalence, reliability and concordance and indications and cautions regarding cross-instrument comparisons.
在卢森堡、希腊和美国这三个国家,对AUDADIS-ADR、CIDI和SCAN在识别国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)酒精和药物使用障碍及诊断标准方面的一致性进行了调查。总体而言,这三种工具在ICD-10酒精、阿片类药物和可卡因依赖诊断方面的一致性为中等至良好,但在其他物质依赖诊断方面通常较低。相比之下,所有物质的有害使用诊断工具之间的一致性极差。根据患病率、可靠性和一致性之间的关系以及跨工具比较的指征和注意事项,对这些主要发现的影响进行了讨论。