Suppr超能文献

通过酒精与药物使用障碍诊断与统计手册第四版(DSM-IV)酒精和药物使用障碍标准及诊断结果的一致性,由酒精与药物使用障碍诊断访谈表-酒精相关障碍版(AUDADIS-ADR)、复合国际诊断访谈表(CIDI)和神经精神疾病临床评定量表(SCAN)进行测量。

Concordance of DSM-IV alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN.

作者信息

Cottler L B, Grant B F, Blaine J, Mavreas V, Pull C, Hasin D, Compton W M, Rubio-Stipec M, Mager D

机构信息

Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997 Sep 25;47(3):195-205. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(97)00090-2.

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the agreement of DSM-IV alcohol and drug use disorder diagnoses generated by three WHO/NIH diagnostic instruments, the AUDADIS-ADR, the CIDI, and the SCAN. This substudy, conducted in three countries, Greece, Luxembourg, and the United States, was part of the larger joint project on diagnosis and classification of mental disorders and alcohol and drug-related problems, which was initiated to evaluate the cross-cultural applicability of the instruments and the criteria. Overall, concordance among the three assessments was good for alcohol and opiate dependence, fair to good for cocaine and sedative dependence, and low for amphetamine dependence. Cannabis dependence concordance was significantly more discrepant than any other substance. Agreement on abuse was low for all substances examined. In addition, the concordance of DSM-IV criteria for each substance was examined. Finally, reasons for discrepancies in responses among assessments were examined, based on discrepancy interview protocol methodology. Further investigation will help to refine these instruments in order to provide a more thorough understanding of alcohol and drug abuse diagnoses.

摘要

本研究旨在检验世界卫生组织/美国国立卫生研究院的三种诊断工具(酒精使用障碍及相关障碍诊断访谈表-酒精相关障碍版[AUDADIS-ADR]、复合性国际诊断访谈表[CIDI]和神经精神病学临床评定表[SCAN])所生成的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)酒精和药物使用障碍诊断结果的一致性。这项在希腊、卢森堡和美国三个国家开展的子研究,是关于精神障碍及酒精和药物相关问题诊断与分类的大型联合项目的一部分,该联合项目旨在评估这些工具及标准的跨文化适用性。总体而言,三种评估方法在酒精和阿片类物质依赖方面的一致性良好,在可卡因和镇静剂依赖方面为中等至良好,在苯丙胺依赖方面较低。大麻依赖方面的一致性差异显著大于其他任何物质。在所检查的所有物质中,关于滥用的一致性较低。此外,还对每种物质的DSM-IV标准的一致性进行了检查。最后,根据差异访谈协议方法,对评估之间反应差异的原因进行了检查。进一步的调查将有助于完善这些工具,以便更全面地理解酒精和药物滥用诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验