Cowen E L, Wyman P A, Work W C, Kim J Y, Fagen D B, Magnus K B
Center for Community Studies, Univ. of Rochester, NY 14620, USA.
Dev Psychopathol. 1997 Summer;9(3):565-77. doi: 10.1017/s0954579497001326.
Reports follow-up study of 181 young highly stressed urban children, classified as stress-resilient (SR) and stress-affected (SA) 1 1/2-2 years earlier. At follow-up (T2), children were retested on five initial (T1) test measures: self-rated adjustment, perceived competence, social problem solving, realistic control attributions, and empathy; parents and teachers did new child adjustment ratings, and parents participated in a phone interview focusing on the T1-T2 interval. Child test and adjustment measures and parent interview responses at T2 sensitively differentiated children classified as SR and SA at T1. Test and interview variables used at T1 and T2 correlated moderately across time periods. At T2, four child test indicators (i.e., rule conformity, global self-worth, social problem solving, and realistic control attributions) and four parent interview variables (positive future expectations for the child, absence of predelinquency indicators, good parent mental health in the past year, and adaptive parent coping strategies) sensitively differentiated children classified as SR and SA at T1. No relationship was found between family stress experienced in the T1-T2 interval and changes in children's adjustment during that period.
报告对181名城市中承受高度压力的儿童进行了随访研究,这些儿童在1年半至2年前被分为压力适应型(SR)和压力受影响型(SA)。在随访(T2)时,对儿童在最初(T1)的五项测试指标上进行了重新测试:自我评定的适应能力、感知能力、社会问题解决能力、现实控制归因和同理心;父母和教师对儿童的适应情况进行了新的评定,并且父母参与了一次电话访谈,访谈重点是T1到T2期间的情况。T2时儿童的测试和适应指标以及父母访谈的回答能够敏感地区分在T1时被分为SR和SA的儿童。T1和T2时使用的测试和访谈变量在不同时间段之间存在适度的相关性。在T2时,四项儿童测试指标(即规则遵守、总体自我价值、社会问题解决和现实控制归因)以及四项父母访谈变量(对孩子积极的未来期望、无犯罪倾向指标、过去一年父母良好的心理健康状况以及适应性的父母应对策略)能够敏感地区分在T1时被分为SR和SA的儿童。未发现T1到T2期间经历的家庭压力与该期间儿童适应情况的变化之间存在关联。