Brouillard R, George F, Fougerousse A
Laboratoire de Chimie des Polyphénols, Université Louis Pasteur, Faculté de Chimie, Strasbourg, France.
Biofactors. 1997;6(4):403-10. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520060406.
Over the past few years, it has been accepted that a moderate red wine consumption is a factor beneficial to human health. Indeed, people of France and Italy, the two major wine-producing European countries, eat a lot of fatty foods but suffer less from fatal heart strokes than people in North-America or in the northern regions of Europe, where wine is not consumed on a regular basis. For a time, ethanol was thought to be the "good" chemical species hiding behind what is known as the "French paradox". Researchers now have turned their investigations towards a family of natural substances called "polyphenols", which are only found in plants and are abundant in grapes. It is well known that these molecules behave as radical scavengers and antioxidants, and it has been demonstrated that they can protect cholesterol in the LDL species from oxidation, a process thought to be at the origin of many fatal heart attacks. However, taken one by one, it remains difficult to demonstrate which are the best polyphenols as far as their antioxidant activities are concerned. The main obstacle in that kind of research is not the design of the chemical and biological tests themselves, but surprisingly enough, the limited access to chemically pure and structurally elucidated polyphenolic compounds. In this article, particular attention will be paid to polyphenols of red wine made from Vitis vinifera cultivars. With respect to the "French paradox", we address the following question: are wine polyphenolic compounds identical to those found in grapes (skin, pulp and seed), or are there biochemical modifications specifically taking place on the native flavonoids when a wine ages? Indeed, structural changes occur during wine conservation, and one of the most studied of those changes concerns red wine colour evolution, called "wine ageing". As a wine ages, it has been demonstrated that the initially present grape pigments slowly turn into new more stable red pigments. That phenomenon goes on for weeks, months and years. Since grape and wine polyphenols are chemically distinct, their antioxidant activities cannot be the same. So, eating grapes might well lead to beneficial effects on human health, due to the variety and sometimes large amounts of their polyphenolic content. However, epidemiological surveys have focused on wines, not on grapes....
在过去几年里,人们已经公认适度饮用红酒是对人体健康有益的一个因素。的确,法国和意大利这两个欧洲主要葡萄酒生产国的人们,食用大量高脂肪食物,但与北美或欧洲北部地区那些不经常饮用葡萄酒的人相比,死于致命心脏病发作的情况要少。曾有一段时间,乙醇被认为是隐藏在所谓“法国悖论”背后的“有益”化学物质。研究人员现在已将他们的调查转向一类名为“多酚”的天然物质,这类物质仅存在于植物中且在葡萄中含量丰富。众所周知,这些分子具有自由基清除剂和抗氧化剂的作用,并且已经证明它们可以保护低密度脂蛋白(LDL)中的胆固醇不被氧化,而这一过程被认为是许多致命心脏病发作的根源。然而,逐一来看,就其抗氧化活性而言,很难证明哪些是最佳的多酚。这类研究的主要障碍并非化学和生物学测试本身的设计,而是令人惊讶的是,获取化学纯且结构已阐明的多酚化合物的途径有限。在本文中,将特别关注由酿酒葡萄品种制成的红酒中的多酚。关于“法国悖论”,我们提出以下问题:葡萄酒中的多酚化合物与葡萄(皮、果肉和籽)中发现的多酚化合物相同吗?或者当葡萄酒陈酿时,天然黄酮类化合物是否会发生特定的生化变化?的确,在葡萄酒保存过程中会发生结构变化,其中研究最多的变化之一涉及红酒颜色的演变,即“葡萄酒陈酿”。随着葡萄酒陈酿,已证明最初存在的葡萄色素会慢慢转变成新的更稳定的红色色素。这种现象会持续数周、数月甚至数年。由于葡萄和葡萄酒中的多酚在化学上是不同的,它们的抗氧化活性也不可能相同。所以,食用葡萄很可能因其多酚含量的多样性以及有时含量较高而对人体健康产生有益影响。然而,流行病学调查关注的是葡萄酒,而非葡萄……