Zhang Y, Rajagopalan M, Brown B A, Wallace R J
Department of Microbiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler, 75710, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Dec;35(12):3132-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3132-3139.1997.
Mycobacterium abscessus is an important cause of water-related nosocomial outbreaks or pseudo-outbreaks. Strain comparison has relied on pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Unfortunately, almost 50% of strains cannot be assessed by this method. We studied 118 strains of M. abscessus previously studied by PFGE by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) PCR, including isolates from eight nosocomial outbreaks. Ten random primers were evaluated by using DNA prepared by boiling or phenol-chloroform extraction. Both DNA preparations gave the same grouping of isolates for three outbreaks compared to the groupings obtained by PFGE. Five outbreaks due to M. abscessus which gave broken DNA by PFGE gave evaluable patterns when studied by RAPD-PCR, with isolate clustering being consistent with that from other laboratory and epidemiologic data. The patterns were highly method dependent, strain comparison required the use of multiple primers, and the method worked best with purified DNA and by using strains for comparison on the same gel. We propose categories of indistinguishable, different, and inconclusive when comparing strains by RAPD-PCR. This study demonstrates that RAPD-PCR can be used for genetic comparison of M. abscessus strains, including strains which cannot be compared by PFGE, but the potential for misinterpretation is greater than that by PFGE.
脓肿分枝杆菌是与水相关的医院感染暴发或假暴发的重要原因。菌株比较一直依赖于脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)。不幸的是,近50%的菌株无法用这种方法进行评估。我们通过随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)PCR研究了118株先前用PFGE研究过的脓肿分枝杆菌菌株,其中包括来自8次医院感染暴发的分离株。使用通过煮沸或酚-氯仿提取制备的DNA对10条随机引物进行了评估。与通过PFGE获得的分组相比,两种DNA制备方法对三次暴发的分离株给出了相同的分组。由PFGE产生破碎DNA的5次脓肿分枝杆菌引起的暴发,在通过RAPD-PCR研究时给出了可评估的图谱,分离株聚类与其他实验室和流行病学数据一致。这些图谱高度依赖方法,菌株比较需要使用多种引物,并且该方法在使用纯化DNA以及在同一凝胶上使用菌株进行比较时效果最佳。我们建议在通过RAPD-PCR比较菌株时分为无法区分、不同和不确定三类。本研究表明,RAPD-PCR可用于脓肿分枝杆菌菌株的基因比较,包括无法用PFGE进行比较的菌株,但误判的可能性大于PFGE。